Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28531
Title: | Go/no-go for food: Attention bias and intention to eat unhealthy food | Contributor(s): | Love, Hamish (author); Bhullar, Navjot (author)![]() ![]() |
Publication Date: | 2020-07-01 | Early Online Version: | 2020-03-04 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104646 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28531 | Abstract: | Objective: The current research evaluated whether Go/No-go training for highly palatable (HP) food affected attention bias for HP food (an automatic/implicit outcome) and intention to eat unhealthy food (a controlled/explicit outcome). Method: A sample of Australian adults representative for age, gender and Body Mass Index (BMI) (N = 561, Mage = 46.31 years, SD = 16.75, 52.3% women, MBMI = 27.11, SD = 6.34) completed self-report measures of dietary psychological constructs and food image modified Stroop tasks as measures of pre- and post-test attention bias for HP food. After random assignment of participants to two conditions, a Go/No-go intervention was used to train HP food targeted inhibitory control in the experimental group, or general inhibitory control in the control group. All research tasks were delivered online. Results: The experimental, HP food inhibitory control training group reported intention to eat less unhealthy food than the control group, F (1, 637) = 4.81, R² = 0.09, p = .029. Counter to expectations, the experimental group exhibited a heightened attention bias to HP food images after the training, F (1, 637) = 9.48, R² = 0.39, p = .002. Conclusion: Go/No-go training for food may improve both top-down and bottom-up inhibitory control, using both automatic and controlled processes. Further, it may not be effective in lowering attention bias for HP food, but may be effective in lowering unhealthy food intake despite raising attention bias for HP food. Further research that tests these effects using varied reaction time tasks is needed to confirm these results and to explore possible alternative explanations. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Appetite, v.150, p. 1-11 | Publisher: | Elsevier BV | Place of Publication: | Netherlands | ISSN: | 1095-8304 0195-6663 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 170106 Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology 170113 Social and Community Psychology |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 520302 Clinical psychology | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 280121 Expanding knowledge in psychology | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Psychology |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
checked on Aug 10, 2024
Page view(s)
2,336
checked on Apr 7, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.