Diet selection and productivity of sheep grazing contrasting pastures

Title
Diet selection and productivity of sheep grazing contrasting pastures
Publication Date
2002
Author(s)
Chen, W.
Scott, James Murray
Blair, Graeme John
Lefroy, R.
Hutchinson, Keith
King, Kathleen Lora
Harris, C.
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
CSIRO Publishing
Place of publication
Australia
DOI
10.1071/AR01091
UNE publication id
une:2903
Abstract
A grazing experiment was conducted at the Big Ridge 2 site CSIRO, Chiswick (30°31'S, 151°39'E), 20 km south of Armidale, New South Wales, Australia. The site was established in 1955. In March 1966, phalaris and white clover were sown and pastures were fertilised annually with superphosphate until 1993. There were 3 pasture treatments, each with 2 replicates: degraded pasture (low phalaris content), phalaris-dominant, and phalaris–white clover. The effect of pasture type on animal production (liveweight gain and wool) was only significant in 1996, when there were large differences in pasture composition and production between the 3 pasture types. n-Alkane based estimates showed that pasture degradation affected diet selection and nutrient intake and thus sheep production. The estimates in this study also showed no clear preference for a single pasture species over time and lack of strong preferential selection for clovers when sheep were grazing 3 contrasting pastures. Preferential selection of a particular species varied over time depending on the presence and availability of alternative species. Although there were large differences in total N and S intake and faecal output between the 3 pastures, the proportion of the dietary nutrient used for production was similar. This observation reveals the importance of further improving pasture and grazing management, particularly in productive phalaris–white clover pasture with high nutrient flux, to improve nutrient recycling through plant uptake and retention by animals in the grazing ecosystem, and reduce losses.
Link
Citation
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 53(5), p. 529-539
ISSN
1444-9838
0004-9409
1836-5795
1836-0947
Start page
529
End page
539

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink