Understanding why peri-urban residents do not report wild dog impacts: an audience segmentation approach

Title
Understanding why peri-urban residents do not report wild dog impacts: an audience segmentation approach
Publication Date
2020
Author(s)
Hine, Donald W
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-7026
Email: dhine@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:dhine
McLeod, Lynette J
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9408-3342
Email: lmcleod7@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:lmcleod6
Please, Patricia M
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-6682
Email: pplease@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:pplease
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Inc
Place of publication
United States of America
DOI
10.1080/10871209.2020.1735579
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/28218
Abstract
Peri-urban populations are diverse, with residents possessing a broad range of values, knowledge and skills related to managing invasive pests. In this article, we employed the COM-B behavior change model and audience segmentation analysis to identify the main barriers that prevent Gold Coast peri-urban residents from reporting wild dog impacts to local government. Participants (n = 383) responded to a random digit dial phone survey that assessed their capability, opportunity and motivation to report wild dogs and their impacts to local government. Audience segmentation analysis identified two types of non-reporters: (a) Reluctant – perceived no benefits of reporting, it took too much effort, and believed dogs should be left alone – and (b) Receptive – acknowledged wild dogs were a threat and understood the benefits of reporting. We describe how segmentation analysis can be used to develop interventions specifically tailored to the needs of each type of non-reporter.
Link
Citation
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 25(4), p. 355-371
ISSN
1533-158X
1087-1209
Start page
355
End page
371

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink