Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/27951
Title: | Cognitive Load on Learning One-Step Equations: A Cross-Cultural Study Between Australia and Malaysia | Contributor(s): | Ngu, Bing Hiong (author)![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Publication Date: | 2019 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/27951 | Abstract: | Students all over the world learn linear equations, which is a universal topic in junior secondary mathematics curriculum. In relation to learning linear equations, the balance method is usually preferred in Western countries. Apparently, the balance method highlights the concept of "balance" on both sides ·of a linear equation, which is critical in understanding the equal (i.e.,- '=') sign concept in equation solving. In contrast, the inverse method is popular in many Asian countries. The inverse method conceptualizes, for example, addition as an inverse operation to subtraction in equation solving. Asian mathematics teachers tend L view the balance method as complicated, error prone, and inefficient for effective learning. Western mathematics teachers, in contrast, regard the inverse method, which emphasizes the importance of procedural manipulation (change sign, change side), a being limited in addressing the equal sign concept. The main difference between the inverse method and the balance method lie in the critical procedural step (e.g., + 2 on both side versus- 2 becomes + 2). For the balance operation (e.g., + 2 on both side. ), the interaction between elements occurs on both sides of the equation. ln contrast, for the inverse operation (- 2 becomes+ 2), interaction between elements occurs on one side of the equation only. Research has indicated that the balance method imposes higher cognitive load than the inverse method, and therefore is inferior in learning linear equations. The present study, cross-cultural in nature, intends to shed light on the ongoing debate between Asian countries and Western countries in regard to the effectiveness of instructional practices (i.e., balance method versus inverse method) for learning linear equations . .Drawing from our previous research inquiries, we implemented an intervention design by which secondary school students in Australia and Malaysia (N = 147) who had no prior knowledge of linear equations were randomly assigned to the balance method or the inverse method lo learn how to solve one-step equations (e.g., x - 3 = - 7). Both the balance group and the inverse group completed a pre-test, studied an instruction sheet completed multiple example-equation pairs, and a post-test. Each example-equation pair comprised of a worked example paired with an equation. For both Australian and Malaysian students, the inverse group outperformed the balance groups for the practice equations not but the post-test. Malaysian students outperformed Australian students on practice problems irrespective of the balance group or the inverse group, whereas Malaysian student outperformed Australian students on post-test for the inverse group only. The present study, in line with the scope of this edited book, is significant for its inquiries into comparative instructional approaches for effective mathematics learning from the perspective of cognitive load imposition. Om examination of an in-class intervention has clarified the myth concerning cross-cultural differences in perceptions, appreciation and understanding of different instructional approaches ( i.e., balance method versus inverse method). The findings have indicated an advantage of the inverse method over the balance method in facilitating learning of one-step equations irrespective of cultural context. | Publication Type: | Book Chapter | Source of Publication: | Selected Topics in Cultural Studies, p. 91-121 | Publisher: | Nova Science Publishers, Inc | Place of Publication: | New York, United States of America | ISBN: | 9781536147360 1536147362 9781536147353 1536147354 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 130208 Mathematics and Numeracy Curriculum and Pedagogy 170103 Educational Psychology |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 390109 Mathematics and numeracy curriculum and pedagogy 520102 Educational psychology |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 970113 Expanding Knowledge in Education 970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 280114 Expanding knowledge in Indigenous studies 280109 Expanding knowledge in education 280121 Expanding knowledge in psychology |
HERDC Category Description: | B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book | Publisher/associated links: | https://novapublishers.com/shop/selected-topics-in-cultural-studies/ | WorldCat record: | http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1082356419 http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1061817946 |
Series Name: | Cultural Studies in the Third Millennium | Editor: | Editor(s): Joannes Ragna Naumov |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Book Chapter School of Education |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
Page view(s)
2,472
checked on Jun 23, 2024
Download(s)
8
checked on Jun 23, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.