Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Reduced availability of rhizobia limits the performance but not invasiveness of introduced Acacia
Contributor(s): Wandrag, Elizabeth M  (author)orcid ; Sheppard, Andy (author); Duncan, Richard P (author); Hulme, Philip E (author)
Publication Date: 2013-09
Early Online Version: 2013-06-13
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12126Open Access Link
Handle Link:
Abstract: 1. The ability to form effective mutualisms with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (rhizobia) is implicated in the success of introduced leguminous plant species, such as Acacia. While Acacia appear to associate with rhizobia where introduced, there is evidence that the extent of this may limit success during early stages of colonization. 2. We examine three Australian Acacia species that have been introduced to New Zealand and ask whether variation in their ability to form rhizobial associations can explain differences in the degree to which they have established and spread since introduction. 3. In both Australia and New Zealand, we used glasshouse experiments to measure growth and nodulation of Acacia seedlings grown under two soil treatments: soils taken from underneath conspecifics (Host+ soils) and soils taken from the same sites but away from Acacia trees (Host ). We predicted that suitable rhizobia would be widespread in Australia leading to similar growth and nodulation in Host+ and Host soils. However, we predicted lower growth and nodulation in New Zealand Host soils, relative to New Zealand Host+ soils, due to limited availability of suitable rhizobia away from established conspecifics. We also predicted that differences between Host+ and Host soils would be less marked in Acacia that were more widespread in New Zealand. Finally, we examined whether the establishment of one Acacia species might facilitate the establishment of other species by planting seedlings into soils associated with each of the two congeners. 4. As predicted, seedling growth and nodulation were lower in Host than Host+ soils in New Zealand but there was no significant difference in Australia. In both countries, the difference between Host+ and Host soils was similar for all three species and in conspecific and congeneric soils. 5. Synthesis. In New Zealand, Acacia seedlings that colonize sites away from established conspecifics or congeners are likely to suffer reduced growth and nodulation, which may limit their ability to establish and spread away from introduction sites. However, this limitation was the same for all three species, implying that interactions with soil biota cannot explain differences in the degree to which these Acacia have spread in New Zealand.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Ecology, 101(5), p. 1103-1113
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 0022-0477
Field of Research (FOR): 050103 Invasive Species Ecology
060504 Microbial Ecology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO): 960805 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scales
961499 Soils not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM



Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.