Author(s) |
Fraser, Helen
|
Publication Date |
2018
|
Abstract |
Recent years have seen a great deal of attention given to the reliability of expert evidence admitted in criminal trials. However, almost no attention has been given to the reliability of evidence provided by so-called ‘ad hoc experts’. Indeed, many forensic scientists seem unaware that such a category of witness even exists, much less of the substantial threats they pose to the fairness of our criminal justice system. ‘Ad hoc experts’ are used for a number of evidence types. Here, we concentrate on one type that appears in Australian courts on a weekly basis: interpretation of indistinct covert recordings. The aim is to draw the attention of AJFS readers to serious problems in the handling of this much-used form of evidence, in the hope that the AAFS might develop a position on the issues and support calls for reform of practice.
|
Citation |
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50(2), p. 125-128
|
ISSN |
1834-562X
0045-0618
|
Link | |
Language |
en
|
Publisher |
Taylor & Francis
|
Title |
Real forensic experts should pay more attention to the dangers posed by ‘ad hoc experts’
|
Type of document |
Journal Article
|
Entity Type |
Publication
|
Name | Size | format | Description | Link |
---|