Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26912
Title: | Genotype x birth type or rearing-type interactions for growth and ultrasound scanning traits in Merino sheep | Contributor(s): | Dakhlan, A (author); Moghaddar, N (author) ; van der Werf, J H J (author) | Publication Date: | 2019-05 | Early Online Version: | 2018-08-01 | DOI: | 10.1071/AN17464 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26912 | Abstract: | This study explores the interaction between genetic potential for growth in Merino lambs and their birth type (BT) or rearing type (RT). Data on birthweight (BWT), weaning weight (WWT), post-weaning weight (PWWT), scan fat (PFAT) and eye muscle depth (PEMD) were used from 3920 single and 4492 twin-born lambs from 285 sires and 5279 dams. Univariate analysis showed a significant sire x BT interaction accounting for 1.59% and 2.49% of the phenotypic variation for BWT and WWT, respectively, and no significant effect for PWWT, PFAT and PEMD. Sire x RT interaction effects were much smaller and only significant for PEMD. Bivariate analysis indicated that the genetic correlation (rg) between trait expression in lambs born and reared as singles versus those born and reared as twins were high for BWT, WWT, PWWT (0.91 ± 0.02 - 0.96 ± 0.01), whereas rg for PFAT and PEMD were lower (0.81 ± 0.03 and 0.86 ± 0.02). The rg between traits expressed in lambs born and reared as singles versus those born as twins but reared as singles were lower: 0.77 ± 0.08, 0.88 ± 0.03, 0.66 ± 0.06 and 0.61 ± 0.08 for WWT, PWWT, PFAT and PEMD, respectively. A different RT only affected the expression of breeding values for PFAT and PEMD (rg 0.62 ± 0.04 and 0.47 ± 0.03, respectively). This study showed genotype x environment interaction for BWT and WWT (sire x BT interaction) and for PEMD (sire by RT interaction). However, sires' breeding value of a model that accounts for sire x BT interaction provides a very similar ranking of sires compared with a model that ignores it, implying that there is no need to correct for the effect in models for genetic evaluation. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Animal Production Science, 59(6), p. 1016-1021 | Publisher: | CSIRO Publishing | Place of Publication: | Australia | ISSN: | 1836-5787 1836-0939 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 070201 Animal Breeding | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 300305 Animal reproduction and breeding | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 830310 Sheep - Meat | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 100412 Sheep for meat | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Jun 22, 2024
Page view(s)
1,404
checked on Jun 16, 2024
Download(s)
4
checked on Jun 16, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.