Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26909
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Lizen
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Debraen
dc.contributor.authorWoods, Cindyen
dc.contributor.authorUsher, Kimen
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-22T04:45:45Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-22T04:45:45Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Advanced Nursing, 75(6), p. 1151-1161en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2648en
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26909-
dc.description.abstractAims: To establish current knowledge about the efficacy and acceptance of intentional rounding in current practice, from the perspective of nurses, patients, patient satisfaction and safety indicators. Background: Intentional rounding is a formal means of nursing staff checking care needs of patients in hospital settings on a regular basis. Design: An integrative literature review conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute manual. Data: sources A literature search from 2000-2017 was conducted using the following electronic databases: The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest, PubMed, Informit, Sage and Scopus. Review methods: Articles were assessed for quality and rigor using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool for Quantitative Studies. A sequential explanatory mixed studies approach was used to combine qualitative and quantitative evidence in a single review. In-depth parallel reviews of the quantitative and qualitative evidence were undertaken, and then a synthesis of the combined qualitative and quantitative evidence conducted. Results: Intentional rounding has positive outcomes on patient satisfaction and safety. Nurses perceive benefits related to intentional rounding; however, some nurses perceive it as an additional, unnecessary task. The effectiveness of intentional rounding is influenced by external factors including leadership and formal rounding education, workload, ward layout, staffing and experience level. Conclusion: Intentional rounding is a positive intervention in patient safety and satisfaction generally, but needs further research and consideration about actual impact, staff delegation, education and engagement, student nurse involvement, documentation and specializing the structure of intentional rounding.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Nursingen
dc.titleIntentional rounding - An integrative literature reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.13897en
dc.identifier.pmid30375025en
local.contributor.firstnameLizen
local.contributor.firstnameDebraen
local.contributor.firstnameCindyen
local.contributor.firstnameKimen
local.subject.for2008111003 Clinical Nursing: Secondary (Acute Care)en
local.subject.seo2008920210 Nursingen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Healthen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Healthen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Healthen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Healthen
local.profile.emaileryan26@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emaildjackso4@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailcwood30@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailkusher@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage1151en
local.format.endpage1161en
local.identifier.scopusid85058116920en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume75en
local.identifier.issue6en
local.contributor.lastnameRyanen
local.contributor.lastnameJacksonen
local.contributor.lastnameWoodsen
local.contributor.lastnameUsheren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:eryan26en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:djackso4en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cwood30en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:kusheren
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-6312-564Xen
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5790-069Xen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9686-5003en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/26909en
local.date.onlineversion2018-10-30-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleIntentional rounding - An integrative literature reviewen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorRyan, Lizen
local.search.authorJackson, Debraen
local.search.authorWoods, Cindyen
local.search.authorUsher, Kimen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000468046100004en
local.year.available2018en
local.year.published2019en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/44f10fb9-e6e4-4839-9fd8-595b14525716en
local.subject.for2020420501 Acute careen
local.subject.seo2020200307 Nursingen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Health
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on May 18, 2024

Page view(s)

2,160
checked on Apr 2, 2023

Download(s)

4
checked on Apr 2, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.