Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26740
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaine, C E Timothyen
dc.contributor.authorStahl, Clementen
dc.contributor.authorCourtois, Elodie Aen
dc.contributor.authorPatino, Sandraen
dc.contributor.authorSarmiento, Carolinaen
dc.contributor.authorBaraloto, Christopheren
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-16T01:03:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-16T01:03:13Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-
dc.identifier.citationFunctional Ecology, 24(6), p. 1202-1210en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2435en
dc.identifier.issn0269-8463en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26740-
dc.description.abstract1.The complex structure of tree bark reflects its many functions, which include structural support as well as defence against fire, pests and pathogens. Thick bark, however, might limit respiration by the living tissues of the trunk. Nevertheless, little research has addressed community-level variation in bark thickness, and to the best of our knowledge, no one has tested multiple hypotheses to explain variation in bark thickness.2.We conducted an extensive survey of bark thickness within and among species of trees in the tropical rain forests of French Guiana. Trunk bark thickness increased by 1·2 mm per 10 cm increase in stem diameter, and varied widely at all taxonomic levels. Mean trunk bark thickness was 4·5 mm (range: 0·5-29 mm), which was less that found in two Amazonian rain forests in previous studies. This survey of bark thickness should be of use for forest management since tree survival through fire is strongly predicted by bark thickness.3.We combined the survey data with multiple data sets to test several functional hypotheses pro-posed to explain variation in bark thickness. We found bark to provide an average of 10% of the flexural rigidity of tree stems, which was substantially less than that found in the only other study of bark stiffness. Bark thickness was uncorrelated with species' association with fire-prone habitats, suggesting that the influence of fire on bark thickness does not extend into moist Forests.There was also little evidence that bark thickness is affected by its function as a defence against herbivory. Nor was there evidence that thick bark limits trunk respiration.4.A re-analysis of previously collected anatomical data indicated that variation in rhytidome(non-conducting outer bark) thickness explains much of the variation in overall bark thickness.As rhytidome is primarily involved in protecting the living tissues of the trunk, we suggest thatbark thickness is driven mostly by its defensive function.5.Functional explanations for the variation in bark thickness were not clear-cut. Nevertheless,this study provides a foundation for further investigation of the functional bases of bark in tropical trees.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofFunctional Ecologyen
dc.titleFunctional explanations for variation in bark thickness in tropical rain forest treesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01736.xen
dcterms.accessRightsBronzeen
local.contributor.firstnameC E Timothyen
local.contributor.firstnameClementen
local.contributor.firstnameElodie Aen
local.contributor.firstnameSandraen
local.contributor.firstnameCarolinaen
local.contributor.firstnameChristopheren
local.subject.for2008060202 Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)en
local.subject.seo2008960806 Forest and Woodlands Flora, Fauna and Biodiversityen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailcpaine2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage1202en
local.format.endpage1210en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume24en
local.identifier.issue6en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnamePaineen
local.contributor.lastnameStahlen
local.contributor.lastnameCourtoisen
local.contributor.lastnamePatinoen
local.contributor.lastnameSarmientoen
local.contributor.lastnameBaralotoen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cpaine2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-8705-3719en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/26740en
local.date.onlineversion2010-11-24-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleFunctional explanations for variation in bark thickness in tropical rain forest treesen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteFrench Agence Nationale de la Recherche granten
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorPaine, C E Timothyen
local.search.authorStahl, Clementen
local.search.authorCourtois, Elodie Aen
local.search.authorPatino, Sandraen
local.search.authorSarmiento, Carolinaen
local.search.authorBaraloto, Christopheren
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.available2010en
local.year.published2010en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/6db428d6-19ea-4076-ad02-9b33759a4509en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

126
checked on Jun 15, 2024

Page view(s)

1,094
checked on Jun 23, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Jun 23, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.