Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26690
Title: Mark Knight vs Serena Williams -- Crossing the Line: Offensive and Controversial Cartoons in the 21st Century -- "The View from Australia" -- Part Two
Contributor(s): Scully, Richard  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2018
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/26690
Abstract: Given the vagaries of the 24-hour_news cycle, by the time you read this, the furor surrounding Mark Knight's cartoon of Serena Williams (Fig. 1) will have died-down. The Australian and international media have moved on; and Williams herself has refused to be drawn on the issue (Blair, 2018). Yet, it deserves to be remembered, not just as an incident of historical importance in cartoon terms. Knight may have intended the cartoon for a purely Australian audience -- or even a narrower one, based in the city of Melbourne, the capital of Australia's second most populous state, Victoria. But in keeping with the new trend towards a global, transnational, and completely borderless context for cartooning (Scully, 2015), and owing largely to the "current configuration of digital media" (Phiddian, 2018), it soon became a world-wide news story, comparable to the Jyllands-Posten controversy of 2005, or Sean Delonas's chimpanzee/Obama cartoon in the New York Post (2009). Partisans in the debate over the cartoon sought to bolster their positions through reference to significant notions of press freedom, freedom of speech, civil rights, and equal opportunity protections under law. Accusations not only of racism, but of sexism were also carried over from broader debate over the original incident, in which Williams argued vociferously with the chair umpire in her U.S. Open loss to Naomi Osaka (King, 2018). In artistic terms, Knight and many of his fellow cartoonists (Brown, 2018a), defended the cartoon on the basis of verisimilitude: Serena Williams is "a giant, aggressive AfroAmerican with a shock of wild hair and a tutu," and the cartoon contained elements of legitimate caricature. Others rejected this, arguing that Knight did not depict Williams in recognizable style at all (McLaughlin, 2018), and in so doing had been lazy, and produced at best a "bad" cartoon. Almost inevitably, those taking sides fell to one side or the other of the conservative/ progressive divide that has characterized Australian and world press culture for decades; which is also characterized by division between multinational media empire News Corp and its competitors (in Australia, primarily Fairfax Media). Unravelling these complex debates reveals much about the shape of cartooning in the early 21st Century.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: International Journal of Comic Art, 20(2), p. 151-176
Publisher: John A Lent, Ed & Pub
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1531-6793
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 210399 Historical Studies not elsewhere classified
220299 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields not elsewhere classified
190301 Journalism Studies
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 470105 Journalism studies
430302 Australian history
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 970121 Expanding Knowledge in History and Archaeology
970119 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of the Creative Arts and Writing
970120 Expanding Knowledge in Language, Communication and Culture
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280122 Expanding knowledge in creative arts and writing studies
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Description: The International Journal of Comic Art is an independent publication, which remains print-only in nature. The journal's online presence is confined to the blog: http://ijoca.blogspot.com/.
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons