Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Comparing medieval and modern musical listening habits
Contributor(s): Stoessel, Jason  (creator)orcid ; Anton-Mendez, Ines  (creator)orcid ; Spreadborough, Kristal  (creator)orcid 
Publication Date: 2018-11
DOI: 10.25952/5c9d76b48e931Open Access Link
Handle Link:
Abstract/Context: This project is a pilot survey which aims to identify 10 words that are considered “sweet” and 10 words that are considered “bitter”. These words will be used in a later study in which investigators will compare innovative computational reconstructions of contrapuntal sweetness of selected early musical works with modern listeners’ aesthetic responses, and consider how auditory experience may influence such responses. However, before this can occur, a pilot survey is needed to identify sweet and bitter words. This is the goal of the present project.
Publication Type: Dataset
Field of Research (FOR): 190409 Musicology and Ethnomusicology
210307 European History (excl. British, Classical Greek and Roman)
200405 Language in Culture and Society (Sociolinguistics)
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO): 950101 Music
950504 Understanding Europe's Past
970119 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of the Creative Arts and Writing
HERDC Category Description: X Dataset
Description: The following information is also contained in the attached "ReadMe" text document. This document contains all the necessary information to reproduce the dataset, as well as the dataset itself. Included are: CONFIDENTIAL - Ethics application in original proprietary formant (Word Doc "EthicsFinalApplicationWithConditionsMet.dox") - Ethics application in open format ("CONFIDENTIALEthicsFinalApplicationWithConditionsMet.odt", "CONFIDENTIALEthicsFinalApplicationWithConditionsMet.pdf") - Ethics conditions in original proprietary format (Word doc "CONFIDENTIALEthicsConditions.dox") - Ethics conditions in open format ("CONFIDENTIALEthicsConditions.odt", "EthicsConditions.pdf") - Ethics approval ("EthicsApproval HE18-255.pdf") - Ethics closure form in original proprietary formant (Word Doc "CONFIDENTIALEthicsFinalReportWithConditionsMet_20HE18-233.dox") - Ethics closure in open format ("CONFIDENTIALEthicsFinalReportWithConditionsMet_20HE18-233.odt", "CONFIDENTIALEthicsFinalReportWithConditionsMet_20HE18-233.pdf") - Ethics closure form conditions in original proprietary formant (Word Doc "CONFIDENTIALEthicsFinalReportConditions_20HE18-233.dox") - Ethics closure form conditions in open format ("CONFIDENTIALEthicsFinalReportConditions_20HE18-233.odt", "CONFIDENTIALEthicsFinalReportConditions_20HE18-233.pdf") OPEN: Can be released after embargo period - The Researchers will advise when the embargo period has lapsed. - Data set in the original proprietary format (Excel Document "AllData.xlsx") - Data set in open format (CSV "RawDataEnglishSpeakersOnlyWordsLabeled20180919.csv", "RawDataAllParticipants20180919.csv", "CleanedDataWordAverages20180919.csv", "CleanedData20180919.csv") - Experiment design and code ("ExperimentStructure.pdf", "ExperimentPrintout.pdf", "ExperimentCode.qsf") - Words used in the experiment ("ExperimentStimuli.pdf") The researchers are contactable at: , , .
Primary Contact Details: Kristal Spreadborough -
Dataset Custodian Details: Kristal Spreadborough -
Appears in Collections:Dataset
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
23 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM



Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.