Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Dynamic optimization for evaluating externalities in agroforestry systems||Contributor(s):||Cacho, Oscar Jose (author) ; Hean, Robyn (author)||Publication Date:||2004||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/2502||Abstract:||Integrating trees in cropping and grazing systems – agroforestry – can provide many benefits in the Australian agricultural context. These include the production of timber and non-timber products such as oils and flowers, fodder, windbreak protection, shade and shelter, wildlife habitat, flood mitigation, soil-erosion control, improved water quality, and reduced dryland-salinity emergence. Prinsley (1992), – Cleugh, Prinsley, Bird, Brooks, Carberry, and Crawford et al. (2002) and other authors in the same volumes present some examples for Australia. Many of the benefits from trees are off-farm environmental services, which are public goods or externalities and which landholders may not take into account. The social benefits from trees may therefore exceed the private benefits, and given such a divergence, landholders may conserve and plant too few trees from a social perspective. Without perfect information, landholders may even underestimate their private benefits from trees and further exacerbate this divergence. Concern for this issue is not new in Australia (see Tisdell, 1985). Market failure due to externalities and imperfect information provides a rationale for government intervention to encourage landholders to invest in vegetation management and reforestation. Regulatory, extension, and market-based approaches are all being used to this end by governments in Australia. State Governments have established regulatory controls on land clearing of private native vegetation (Walpole, 1999; Stoneham, Chaudhri, Ha, & Strappazzon, 2003), such as the Native Vegetation Conservation Act in New South Wales (NSW) and The Planning and Environment Act in Victoria. State and Federal Governments have also implemented extension programs to provide funds and/or assistance to landholders and community groups to manage native vegetation on private land. At the State level, these programs include Land for Wildlife and Trust for Nature in Victoria, and the Voluntary Conservation Agreement Program in Queensland. At the Federal level, there is Landcare, One Billion Trees, Save the Bush, Bushcare, National Heritage Trust, and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. Stoneham et al.||Publication Type:||Book Chapter||Source of Publication:||Valuing Agroforestry Systems: methods and applications, v.2, p. 139-163||Publisher:||Kluwer Academic Publishers||Place of Publication:||Dordrecht, The Netherlands||ISBN:||1402024126||Field of Research (FOR):||140205 Environment and Resource Economics||Other Links:||http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Q7rGRgFV2zwC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA139
|Series Name:||Advances in agroforestry||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 147
|Appears in Collections:||Book Chapter|
Files in This Item:
checked on May 2, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.