Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23441
Title: | Reply: On the Use of Odds Ratios Versus Hazard Ratios, Meta-Regression, and Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses | Contributor(s): | Smart, Neil (author) ; Dieberg, Gudrun (author) ; King, Nicola (author) | Publication Date: | 2018 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.018 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23441 | Abstract: | We thank the editor of the Journal for the opportunity to respond to the letters by Dr. Shah, Dr. Ma and colleagues, and Dr. Zhao and colleagues, which all make similar statements about 3 aspects of the methodology used in our recent meta-analysis. As the points raised are sufficiently similar, we will address them as if they were derived from the same letter. First, the use of odds ratios instead of hazard ratios was raised in the letters to the editor. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(3), p. 347-347 | Publisher: | Elsevier Inc | Place of Publication: | United States of America | ISSN: | 1558-3597 0735-1097 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 320101 Cardiology (incl. cardiovascular diseases) 490508 Statistical data science |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 920118 Surgical Methods and Procedures | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 200101 Diagnosis of human diseases and conditions | HERDC Category Description: | C4 Letter of Note |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Science and Technology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Dec 28, 2024
Page view(s)
2,002
checked on Apr 28, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.