Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23441
Title: Reply: On the Use of Odds Ratios Versus Hazard Ratios, Meta-Regression, and Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses
Contributor(s): Smart, Neil  (author)orcid ; Dieberg, Gudrun  (author)orcid ; King, Nicola (author)
Publication Date: 2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.018
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23441
Abstract: We thank the editor of the Journal for the opportunity to respond to the letters by Dr. Shah, Dr. Ma and colleagues, and Dr. Zhao and colleagues, which all make similar statements about 3 aspects of the methodology used in our recent meta-analysis. As the points raised are sufficiently similar, we will address them as if they were derived from the same letter. First, the use of odds ratios instead of hazard ratios was raised in the letters to the editor.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(3), p. 347-347
Publisher: Elsevier Inc
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1558-3597
0735-1097
Field of Research (FOR): 119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified
HERDC Category Description: C4 Letter of Note
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

298
checked on May 3, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.