Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23219
Title: Evaluating Pacific Curriculum: Making Learning Relevant
Contributor(s): Taylor, Neil  (author)orcid ; Kings, Clive (author)
Publication Date: 2000
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23219
Open Access Link: http://www.directions.usp.ac.fj/collect/direct/index/assoc/D1065478.dir/doc.pdfOpen Access Link
Abstract: There is often confusion in education about the terms assessment and evaluation, which many people use interchangeably. This is not strictly correct and for the discussion which follows, the term assessment is used exclusively in terms of the assessment of pupil performance. Evaluation, on the other hand, is defined as the collection of information to make decisions about resources, facilities, programmes or teaching facilities. This is a much broader process and assessment information obviously may contribute to the information base of evaluation. Scriven (1967) has distinguished between formative and summative evaluation.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Pacific Curriculum Network, 9(2), p. 2-5
Publisher: Institute of Education University of the South Pacific
Place of Publication: Tonga
ISSN: 1562-4706
Field of Research (FOR): 130299 Curriculum and Pedagogy not elsewhere classified
130199 Education systems not elsewhere classified
130311 Pacific Peoples Education
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO): 930302 Syllabus and Curriculum Development
930201 Pedagogy
930301 Assessment and Evaluation of Curriculum
HERDC Category Description: C2 Non-Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 6
Views: 8
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Education

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

90
checked on Mar 5, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.