Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23163
Title: The Economic Impact of Imports on the Australian Pig Industry: Is it Time for the WTO’s Safeguard Measures? 2. Re-estimating the Productivity Commission's Vector Autoregression and Inverse Demand Models
Contributor(s): Popat, Meizal (author); Griffith, Garry  (author)orcid ; Mounter, Stuart  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2017
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/23163
Open Access Link: https://blog.une.edu.au/australasian-agribusiness-review/2017/10/12/pigmeat-imports-re-estimating-the-2008-pc-models/Open Access Link
Abstract: In its 2008 Inquiry report into the impact of imports on the Australian pig meat industry, the Productivity Commission (PC) concluded that the main reason for the declining profitability of pig farmers in Australia was the higher costs of feed in the domestic market. Movements of the Australian dollar were also found to favour increased imports of pig meat. Based on analyses conducted with data up to 2007, the PC was unable to justify the need for Australia to activate the safeguard measures prescribed under the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules in order to temporarily protect the local pig industry. In a preceding paper, using exactly the same methods but with a dataset updated to 2013, the authors found that domestic production, rather than import volumes or prices, has been affecting the saleyard price and that there was not a strong causal effect between import volume or unit values and domestic production or saleyard price. Thus, based on a straightforward updating of the PC's models, the PC conclusions were confirmed: it is unlikely that a new case could be made for the application of the WTO safeguard measures to the Australian pig meat industry. However, there were a number of statistical problems with the PC models that were simply updated for the previous analysis. In this paper, the PC models are re-specified and re-estimated to overcome these statistical problems. However, the misspecifications do not lead to any different implications of the results.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Australasian Agribusiness Review, v.25, p. 21-30
Publisher: University of Melbourne
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1833-5675
1442-6951
1320-0348
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 140302 Econometric and Statistical Methods
070106 Farm Management, Rural Management and Agribusiness
140201 Agricultural Economics
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 380101 Agricultural economics
300208 Farm management, rural management and agribusiness
380202 Econometric and statistical methods
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 910299 Microeconomics not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 150599 Microeconomics not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
UNE Business School

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

2,464
checked on Mar 24, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.