Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22969
Title: | Days to calving in artificially inseminated cattle: Alternative models and analyses | Contributor(s): | Robinson, Dorothy L (author) | Publication Date: | 2008 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.11.010 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22969 | Abstract: | Investigations by Robinson [Robinson, D.L., 2007. Days to calving in artificially inseminated cattle: comparison of potential traits. Livestock Science 110, 174-180] concluded that the most useful trait for assessing fertility of artificially inseminated (AI) beef cows is AI days to calving (AIDC), a trait that mimics days to calving for naturally mated cows. Various fixed and random effects were fitted to AIDC to determine the best way of modelling lactation status of the cow, the effect of service sire, using smaller contemporary groups and lowering the penalty value for non-calvers. Fitting the time interval between calving and the start of mating either as a 10-level factor or a cubic spline function explained considerably more variation than fitting the standard 2-level factor (wet or dry). Estimated permanent environmental effects of the cow were considerably reduced. This suggests that, if a cow calves late in the season (less than 60 days before she is inseminated), her fertility is reduced. Models should therefore account for this effect. If fitted, service sire explained 1.6% of phenotypic variation, compared to a much larger sire x contemporary group interaction (3% of phenotypic variation). It is therefore important to account for sire x contemporary group interactions. When the fertility of service sires is not being evaluated, service sires could be incorporated into the definition of contemporary groups. Ideally, breeders should be encouraged to formally record contemporary (or mating) groups. Reducing the size of contemporary groups (inferred from the data) by limiting the time interval between first and last inseminations from 120 to 60 days had only a marginal effect as did reducing the penalty for non-calvers from 21 to 10 days. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Livestock Science, 117(1), p. 34-42 | Publisher: | Elsevier BV | Place of Publication: | Netherlands | ISSN: | 1871-1413 | Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 070201 Animal Breeding | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 830301 Beef Cattle | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
9
checked on Jan 11, 2025
Page view(s)
1,206
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.