Commentary on aerobic versus isometric handgrip exercise in hypertension: A randomized controlled trial

Title
Commentary on aerobic versus isometric handgrip exercise in hypertension: A randomized controlled trial
Publication Date
2017
Author(s)
Smart, Neil
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8290-6409
Email: nsmart2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:nsmart2
Carlson, Debra J
Swaine, Ian
McGowan, Cheri
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Place of publication
United States of America
DOI
10.1097/HJH.0000000000001566
UNE publication id
une:23062
Abstract
We, members of the International Working Group on Isometric Exercise, read with great interest the article by Pagonas et al. on the comparative effects of aerobic and isometric handgrip exercise (IRT). However, we believe the finding, that aerobic exercise induces reductions in blood pressure (BP), whereas isometric exercise training (handgrip) does not, to be compromised for several reasons: First, the groups were not matched at baseline for resting SBP (office SBP- Table 2) differed by an egregious 8.8 mmHg between IRT and aerobic groups. Millar et al.[1] showed, some years ago, that account must be taken of baseline BP values, when analysing training-induced changes. The probability that a 9-mmHg difference in resting blood occurred by chance in a properly randomized study is very remote; moreover, the authors reported that this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.36). Because of these sizeable differences in baseline BP measures, the aerobic training group clearly had greater potential to regress to the mean.
Link
Citation
Journal of Hypertension, 35(12), p. 2554-2556
ISSN
1473-5598
0263-6352
Start page
2554
End page
2556

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink