Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22841
Title: Combining Costs and Benefits of Animal Activities to Assess Net Yield Outcomes in Apple Orchards
Contributor(s): Saunders, Manu  (author)orcid ; Luck, Gary W (author)
Publication Date: 2016
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158618Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22841
Abstract: Diverse animal communities influence ecosystem function in agroecosystems through positive and negative plant-animal interactions. Yet, past research has largely failed to examine multiple interactions that can have opposing impacts on agricultural production in a given context. We collected data on arthropod communities and yield quality and quantity parameters (fruit set, yield loss and net outcomes) in three major apple-growing regions in south-eastern Australia. We quantified the net yield outcome (accounting for positive and negative interactions) of multiple animal activities (pollination, fruit damage, biological control) across the entire growing season on netted branches, which excluded vertebrate predators of arthropods, and open branches. Net outcome was calculated as the number of undamaged fruit at harvest as a proportion of the number of blossoms (i.e., potential fruit yield). Vertebrate exclusion resulted in lower levels of fruit set and higher levels of arthropod damage to apples, but did not affect net outcomes. Yield quality and quantity parameters (fruit set, yield loss, net outcomes) were not directly associated with arthropod functional groups. Model variance and significant differences between the ratio of pest to beneficial arthropods between regions indicated that complex relationships between environmental factors and multiple animal interactions have a combined effect on yield. Our results show that focusing on a single crop stage, species group or ecosystem function/service can overlook important complexity in ecological processes within the system. Accounting for this complexity and quantifying the net outcome of ecological interactions within the system, is more informative for research and management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Grant Details: ARC/DP140100709
Source of Publication: PLoS One, 11(7), p. 1-16
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1932-6203
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 060202 Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
070301 Agro-ecosystem Function and Prediction
050102 Ecosystem Function
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 310302 Community ecology (excl. invasive species ecology)
300402 Agro-ecosystem function and prediction
410203 Ecosystem function
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960504 Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Farmland, Arable Cropland and Permanent Cropland Environments
820210 Pome Fruit, Pip Fruit
960904 Farmland, Arable Cropland and Permanent Cropland Land Management
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180601 Assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystems
260511 Pome fruit, pip fruit
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
UNE Business School

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Jan 20, 2024

Page view(s)

2,190
checked on Jan 28, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.