Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22819
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Nishaen
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Peteren
dc.contributor.authorHine, Brad Cen
dc.contributor.authorMcNally, Jen
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Nishchal Kumaren
dc.contributor.authorIqbal, Zafaren
dc.contributor.authorNormant, Camilleen
dc.contributor.authorAndronicos, Nicholasen
dc.contributor.authorSwick, Robert Aen
dc.contributor.authorRuhnke, Isabelleen
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-17T09:45:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationPoultry Science, 97(2), p. 494-502en
dc.identifier.issn1525-3171en
dc.identifier.issn0032-5791en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22819-
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted to determine the effect of Ascaridia galli infection on free-range laying hens. Lohmann Brown laying hens (n = 200) at 17 wk of age were allocated to 4 treatment groups (n = 50 per group), each with 5 replicate pens of 10 hens. Hens in 3 treatment groups were orally inoculated with different doses of embryonated A. galli eggs: low (250 eggs), medium (1,000 eggs), and high (2,500 eggs) levels, whereas hens of the control group were not infected. Infection levels were monitored using excreta egg counts and mature A. galli worm counts in the intestine. Anti A. galli antibody titers (IgY) in the serum were measured prior to infection, and at 6, 11, 15, and 20 wk post infection (PI) and in egg yolk at 11 and 20 wk PI. Parameters evaluated included feed intake, egg production, egg weight, egg mass, FCR, liver weight, liver fat, and intra epithelial immune cell infiltration. The results showed no difference in feed intake, body weight, or FCR among any treatment groups (P > 0.05). Egg production was lower in the low infection group compared to other groups at 20 wk of age (P < 0.01). Serum IgY was higher in the infected groups' hens at 20 wk PI compared to control group hens (P < 0.01). Yolk IgY increased significantly over time and was higher in infected hens compared to hens of the control group at 11 and 20 wk PI (P < 0.001). No differences were observed in liver lipid content or intraepithelial lymphocytes infiltration among treatment groups. Ascaridia galli eggs in the coprodeum content and adult A. galli worm count were higher in infected hens compared to hens of the control group (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the effects of artificial infection with A. galli on the parameters investigated were minor, and egg yolk antibody may be a more reliable indicator of A. galli infection than serum antibody or excreta egg count.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofPoultry Scienceen
dc.titleEffect of an artificial Ascaridia galli infection on egg production, immune response, and liver lipid reserve of free-range laying hensen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.3382/ps/pex347en
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Immunologyen
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Nutritionen
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Managementen
local.contributor.firstnameNishaen
local.contributor.firstnamePeteren
local.contributor.firstnameBrad Cen
local.contributor.firstnameJen
local.contributor.firstnameNishchal Kumaren
local.contributor.firstnameZafaren
local.contributor.firstnameCamilleen
local.contributor.firstnameNicholasen
local.contributor.firstnameRobert Aen
local.contributor.firstnameIsabelleen
local.subject.for2008070204 Animal Nutritionen
local.subject.for2008060804 Animal Immunologyen
local.subject.for2008070203 Animal Managementen
local.subject.seo2008839999 Animal Production and Animal Primary Products not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008830501 Eggsen
local.subject.seo2008839901 Animal Welfareen
local.profile.schoolSchool of E&RS - Animal Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.schoolPoultry Hub Australiaen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailnsharma5@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailnsharma4@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailziqbal3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailcnormant@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailnandroni@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrswick@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailiruhnke@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20180211-093859en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.identifier.runningnumberpex347en
local.format.startpage494en
local.format.endpage502en
local.identifier.scopusid85041655721en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume97en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.contributor.lastnameSharmaen
local.contributor.lastnameHunten
local.contributor.lastnameHineen
local.contributor.lastnameMcNallyen
local.contributor.lastnameSharmaen
local.contributor.lastnameIqbalen
local.contributor.lastnameNormanten
local.contributor.lastnameAndronicosen
local.contributor.lastnameSwicken
local.contributor.lastnameRuhnkeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nsharma5en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nsharma4en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ziqbal3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cnormanten
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nandronien
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rswicken
dc.identifier.staffune-id:iruhnkeen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-8013-9269en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5881-2296en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-3376-1677en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5423-9306en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:23003en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22819en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleEffect of an artificial Ascaridia galli infection on egg production, immune response, and liver lipid reserve of free-range laying hensen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorSharma, Nishaen
local.search.authorHunt, Peteren
local.search.authorHine, Brad Cen
local.search.authorMcNally, Jen
local.search.authorSharma, Nishchal Kumaren
local.search.authorIqbal, Zafaren
local.search.authorNormant, Camilleen
local.search.authorAndronicos, Nicholasen
local.search.authorSwick, Robert Aen
local.search.authorRuhnke, Isabelleen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000424248600017en
local.year.published2018en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/e930f9d2-3b24-4354-b673-90824c62e035en
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.for2020310905 Animal immunologyen
local.subject.for2020300302 Animal managementen
local.subject.seo2020100601 Eggsen
local.subject.seo2020109902 Animal welfareen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Jan 13, 2024

Page view(s)

1,946
checked on Jan 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.