Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22702
Title: | Contract bonus systems to encourage biosecurity adoption on small-scale broiler farms in Indonesia | Contributor(s): | Komaladara, Anak Agung Sagung Putri (author); Patrick, Ian (author); Hoang, Nam (author) | Publication Date: | 2018 | DOI: | 10.1071/AN15845 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22702 | Abstract: | Ongoing economic losses in the poultry industry, due to endemic diseases such as highly pathogenic avian influenza and Newcastle disease, ensure that biosecurity adoption on small-scale broiler farms remains a priority for Indonesia. However, given their economic constraints and the nature of the market for their products, these smallholders need to be convinced that there is an economic benefit to them from investing in biosecurity. As the majority of smallholders manage their birds under a contract, these contract companies not only need to be involved in the discussion but, if they are not prepared to assist directly in assisting with improved biosecurity, need to ensure that the conditions of the contract do encourage this smallholder investment. Every contract includes price and performance bonuses and, although the nature of these vary between contract companies, they are designed to encourage productivity improvement. This study evaluates existing contract bonus systems in six major contract companies in Indonesia and their capacity to encourage investment in biosecurity. Results indicated that the price bonus plays a significant role in providing additional smallholder income. If higher than expected sale prices are obtained, contracts with companies 3, 5 and 6 ensure that a greater proportion of this price is passed on to smallholders. Contracts 2, 4, and 6 provide farmers with higher performance bonuses, indicating that these companies encourage farmers to improve production efficiency. Overall estimates after the initial year of biosecurity investment show improvements in returns, where farmers can receive up to USD 2.73 for every dollar invested in biosecurity. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Animal Production Science, 58(3), p. 595-600 | Publisher: | CSIRO Publishing | Place of Publication: | Australia | ISSN: | 1836-5787 1836-0939 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 140201 Agricultural Economics 140299 Applied Economics not elsewhere classified |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 380101 Agricultural economics 380199 Applied economics not elsewhere classified |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 839999 Animal Production and Animal Primary Products not elsewhere classified | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 109999 Other animal production and animal primary products not elsewhere classified | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Psychology UNE Business School |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
7
checked on Nov 2, 2024
Page view(s)
2,508
checked on Jan 14, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.