| Title |
|
Learning in higher education: Machinima vs traditional video |
|
|
| Publication Date |
|
| Author(s) |
|
| Editor |
|
Editor(s): L. Gomez Chova, A. Lopez Martinez, I. Candel Torres |
|
|
| Type of document |
|
| Language |
|
| Entity Type |
|
| Publisher |
|
International Association of Technology, Education and Development (IATED) |
|
|
| Place of publication |
|
| DOI |
|
10.21125/edulearn.2017.0685 |
|
|
| UNE publication id |
|
| Abstract |
|
Two academics at a regional university in Australia explore the differences between creating machinima and traditional video for their Higher Education students. The media is used for their undergraduate first-year online Education and Accounting students. Outlined is an overview of the two medium and their conclusions as to the machinima/video they prefer to use as a resource for their student and why. Machinima and traditional videos have been used with the author's students over the past ten years. In Education, the use of machinima/video has been an added resource and was not compulsory to use. With the Accounting students, the machinima/video were used to complement a compulsory component of the student's study resources. Due to this, there were many more views of the machinima/video of the Accounting students due to the videos being used as a resource for assessable tasks. This paper explores the academic's perceptions of the benefits of using the two medium. |
|
|
| Link |
|
| Citation |
|
EDULEARN17 Proceedings: 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, p. 8978-8984 |
|
|
| ISSN |
|
| ISBN |
|
| Start page |
|
| End page |
|