Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Intentional interference with the person||Contributor(s):||Lunney, Mark (author)||Publication Date:||2015||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22249||Abstract:||Historically, intentional interference with the person was dealt with both civilly and criminally through the writ of trespass. Although the link between tort and crime continues so that conduct which amounts to an intentional tort may also constitute a crime, the term 'trespass to the person' refers today to the civil claims of battery, assault and false imprisonment. There may also be a limited, residual category of intentional acts causing harm of which the case of 'Wilkinson v Downton' is representative.||Publication Type:||Book Chapter||Source of Publication:||The Law of Tort, p. 417-466||Publisher:||LexisNexis Butterworths||Place of Publication:||London||ISBN:||9781405763448||Field of Research (FOR):||180126 Tort Law||HERDC Category Description:||B3 Chapter in a Revision/New Edition of a Book||Series Name:||Butterworths common law series||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 10
|Appears in Collections:||Book Chapter|
School of Law
Files in This Item:
checked on Dec 29, 2018
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.