Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22108
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVelazco, J Ien
dc.contributor.authorMayer, D Gen
dc.contributor.authorZimmerman, Sen
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, Rogeren
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-06T11:27:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal, 10(1), p. 25-33en
dc.identifier.issn1751-732Xen
dc.identifier.issn1751-7311en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22108-
dc.description.abstractMethods to measure enteric methane (CH4) emissions from individual ruminants in their production environment are required to validate emission inventories and verify mitigation claims. Estimates of daily methane production (DMP) based on consolidated short-term emission measurements are developing, but method verification is required. Two cattle experiments were undertaken to test the hypothesis that DMP estimated by averaging multiple short-term breath measures of methane emission rate did not differ from DMP measured in respiration chambers (RC). Short-term emission rates were obtained from a GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) unit, which measured emission rate while cattle consumed a dispensed supplement. In experiment 1 (Expt. 1), four non-lactating cattle (LW=518 kg) were adapted for 18 days then measured for six consecutive periods. Each period consisted of 2 days of ad libitum intake and GEM emission measurement followed by 1 day in the RC. A prototype GEM unit releasing water as an attractant (GEM water) was also evaluated in Expt. 1. Experiment 2 (Expt. 2) was a larger study based on similar design with 10 cattle (LW=365 kg), adapted for 21 days and GEM measurement was extended to 3 days in each of the six periods. In Expt. 1, there was no difference in DMP estimated by the GEM unit relative to the RC (209.7 v. 215.1 g CH4/day) and no difference between these methods in methane yield (MY, 22.7 v. 23.7 g CH4/kg of dry matter intake, DMI). In Expt. 2, the correlation between GEM and RC measures of DMP and MY were assessed using 95% confidence intervals, with no difference in DMP or MY between methods and high correlations between GEM and RC measures for DMP (r=0.85; 215 v. 198 g CH4/day SEM=3.0) and for MY (r=0.60; 23.8 v. 22.1 g CH4/kg DMI SEM=0.42). When data from both experiments was combined neither DMP nor MY differed between GEM- and RC-based measures (P>0.05). GEM water-based estimates of DMP and MY were lower than RC and GEM (P<0.05). Cattle accessed the GEM water unit with similar frequency to the GEM unit (2.8 v. 3.5 times/day, respectively) but eructation frequency was reduced from 1.31 times/min (GEM) to once every 2.6 min (GEM water). These studies confirm the hypothesis that DMP estimated by averaging multiple short-term breath measures of methane emission rate using GEM does not differ from measures of DMP obtained from RCs. Further, combining many short-term measures of methane production rate during supplement consumption provides an estimate of DMP, which can be usefully applied in estimating MY.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimalen
dc.titleUse of short-term breath measures to estimate daily methane production by cattleen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1751731115001603en
dcterms.accessRightsGolden
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Managementen
dc.subject.keywordsAgricultural and Veterinary Sciencesen
dc.subject.keywordsAgriculture, Land and Farm Managementen
local.contributor.firstnameJ Ien
local.contributor.firstnameD Gen
local.contributor.firstnameSen
local.contributor.firstnameRogeren
local.subject.for2008070199 Agriculture, Land and Farm Management not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.for2008070203 Animal Managementen
local.subject.for2008079999 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008830302 Dairy Cattleen
local.subject.seo2008830301 Beef Cattleen
local.subject.seo2008830399 Livestock Raising not elsewhere classifieden
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailrhegart3@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-chute-20171103-120404en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage25en
local.format.endpage33en
local.identifier.scopusid84951566762en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume10en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameVelazcoen
local.contributor.lastnameMayeren
local.contributor.lastnameZimmermanen
local.contributor.lastnameHegartyen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rhegart3en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:22298en
local.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22108en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleUse of short-term breath measures to estimate daily methane production by cattleen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorVelazco, J Ien
local.search.authorMayer, D Gen
local.search.authorZimmerman, Sen
local.search.authorHegarty, Rogeren
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2016en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/b0cf7356-4d2e-49dc-b54d-3c2f03e06b84en
local.subject.for2020300302 Animal managementen
local.subject.seo2020100402 Dairy cattleen
local.subject.seo2020100401 Beef cattleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.