Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22095
Title: "Which camera trap type and how many do I need?" A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications
Contributor(s): Rovero, Francesco (author); Zimmermann, Fridolin (author); Berzi, Duccio (author); Meek, Paul  (author)
Publication Date: 2013
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.4404/hystrix-24.2-6316Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/22095
Abstract: Automatically triggered cameras taking photographs or videos of passing animals (camera traps) have emerged over the last decade as one of the most powerful tool for wildlife research. In parallel, a wealth of camera trap systems and models has become commercially available, a phenomenon mainly driven by the increased use of camera traps by sport hunters. This has raised the need for developing criteria to choose the suitable camera trap model in relation to a range of factors, primarily the study aim, but also target species, habitat, trapping site, climate and any other aspect that affects camera performance. There is also fragmented information on the fundamentals of sampling designs that deploy camera trapping, such as number of sampling sites, spatial arrangement and sampling duration. In this review, we describe the relevant technological features of camera traps and propose a set of the key ones to be evaluated when choosing camera models. These features are camera specifications such as trigger speed, sensor sensitivity, detection zone, flash type and flash intensity, power autonomy, and related specifications. We then outline sampling design and camera features for the implementation of major camera trapping applications, specifically: (1) faunal inventories, (2) occupancy studies, (3) density estimation through Capture-Mark-Recapture and (4) density estimation through the Random Encounter Model. We also review a range of currently available models and stress the need for standardized testing of camera models that should be frequently updated and widely distributed. Finally we summarize the "ultimate camera trap", as desired by wildlife biologists, and the current technological limitations of camera traps in relation to their potential for a number of emerging applications. © 2013 Associazione Teriologica Italiana.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Hystrix, 24(2), p. 148-156
Publisher: Associazione Teriologica Romana
Place of Publication: Italy
ISSN: 1825-5272
0394-1914
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 060299 Ecology not elsewhere classified
050199 Ecological Applications not elsewhere classified
050206 Environmental Monitoring
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 310399 Ecology not elsewhere classified
410199 Climate change impacts and adaptation not elsewhere classified
410599 Pollution and contamination not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960899 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity of Environments not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 189999 Other environmental management not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Publisher/associated links: http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/article/view/8789
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

280
checked on Nov 25, 2023

Page view(s)

1,212
checked on Sep 24, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.