Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21868
Title: | Eye and ear preferences | Contributor(s): | Rogers, Lesley (author) | Publication Date: | 2017 | DOI: | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6725-4_3 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21868 | Abstract: | This chapter covers methods of measuring preferences to use one eye or ear to attend to a stimulus, which reflects lateralized processing of sensory information. It begins with monocular occlusion as a way of measuring differences in strength or nature of response elicited by particular visual stimuli. Depending on the type of stimulus presented a preference for responding using the left or right eye can be found ( e.g. chicks show a right-eye preference when searching for food grains and a left-eye preference when attacking a conspecific or responding to a predator). Especially in species with their eyes positioned on the sides of their head, this reflects differences in processing by the left and right sides of the brain. In these species it is also possible to test responses to stimuli presented in the left versus right monocular visual fields without having to apply eye patches. A method of determining the extents of the monocular and binocular visual fields is explained. Then a modification of the monocular testing method involving rotation of the stimulus around rhe animal being tested is discussed: as shown in frogs and toads, response to prey moved in this manner differs between clockwise and anticlockwise rotation. Eye preferences can also be determined using binocular presentation of stimuli that cause the test animal to turn its head to permit monocular fixation of the stimulus before a specific response is made (e.g. before attacking a conspecific, as scored in chicks and horses). Angles adopted by fish when viewing their image in a mirror have been used to measure lateralization of attending to a conspecific. Another approach is simultaneous introduction of identical stimuli into the monocular field of each eye and assessment of side biases in responding (as in toads striking at insect prey). Visual pathways are discussed briefly to help explain how eye preferences reveal brain lateralization. Next, several methods of measuring lateralization of processing and responding to auditory stimuli are covered and finally some points are made about future directions of research along these lines. The suitability of these methods for testing different species is considered in all sections of the chapter. | Publication Type: | Book Chapter | Source of Publication: | Lateralized Brain Functions: Methods in Human and Non-Human Species, p. 79-102 | Publisher: | Humana Press | Place of Publication: | New York, United States of America | ISBN: | 9781493967230 | Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 069999 Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 310901 Animal behaviour 310906 Animal neurobiology |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 280102 Expanding knowledge in the biological sciences | HERDC Category Description: | B1 Chapter in a Scholarly Book | Series Name: | Neuromethods | Series Number : | 122 | Editor: | Editor(s): L J Rogers and G Vallortigara |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Book Chapter School of Science and Technology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
21
checked on Nov 23, 2024
Page view(s)
1,766
checked on Jun 23, 2024
Download(s)
2
checked on Jun 23, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.