Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21857
Title: Stakeholder Perceptions of Welfare Issues and Indicators for Extensively Managed Sheep in Australia
Contributor(s): Doughty, Amanda  (author); Coleman, Grahame J (author); Hinch, Geoffrey  (author)orcid ; Doyle, Rebecca E (author)
Publication Date: 2017
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.3390/ani7040028Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21857
Abstract: An online survey was designed to form the basis of a framework for the welfare assessment of extensively managed sheep in Australia. The survey focused on welfare compromise and useful welfare indicators. A total of 952 people completed the survey in its entirety, representing four stakeholder groups: Public (53.6%), Producer (27.4%), Scientist (9.9%), and Service provider (9.1%). Animal welfare was considered to be important by all participating groups in this survey (average score of 3.78/4). Respondents felt the welfare of grazing sheep was generally adequate but improvement was desired (2.98/5), with female members of the public rating sheep welfare significantly worse than other respondents (p < 0.05). Environmental issues were considered to pose the greatest risk to welfare (3.87/5), followed by heat stress (3.79), lameness (3.57) and husbandry practices (3.37). Key indicators recognised by all respondents were those associated with pain and fear (3.98/5), nutrition (4.23), mortality/management (4.27), food on offer (4.41) and number of illness/injures in a flock (4.33). There were gender and stakeholder differences in the perceived importance of both welfare issues and indicators with women and the public consistently rating issues (all p < 0.01) and indicators (all p < 0.05) to be of greater significance than other respondents. These results highlight the importance of including all stakeholders and an even balance of genders when developing a welfare framework that can address both practical and societal concerns.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Animals, v.7 (4)
Publisher: MDPIAG
Place of Publication: Switzerland
ISSN: 2076-2615
Field of Research (FOR): 070207 Humane Animal Treatment
Socio-Economic Outcome Codes: 839901 Animal Welfare
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 12
Views: 19
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Nov 30, 2018

Page view(s)

132
checked on Mar 4, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.