Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21211
Title: A Comparative Analysis of Crime Risk Assessments and their Application in Greater Manchester and New South Wales
Contributor(s): Monchuk, Leanne (author); Clancey, Garner (author)
Publication Date: 2013
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.2148/benv.39.1.74
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/21211
Abstract: While the principles of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) are well documented and feature in design and planning documents, they are still not typically considered and successfully incorporated in the design and planning of a new development. Failure to incorporate the principles of CPTED in the initial design of a development can delay the planning application if later changes are required, impact on crime if left unattended, and impact negatively upon the aesthetics of the development if retrospective crime prevention measures are required. This paper describes how attempts have been made to embed the principles of CPTED in the planning process in Greater Manchester and New South Wales. It outlines the mechanisms these two jurisdictions have adopted namely the Crime Impact Statement (Greater Manchester) and the Crime Risk Assessment (New South Wales) and provides a critical analysis of the similarities and differences between the two approaches. Through this comparative analysis, key positive features of each approach will be identified, leading to the identification of potential ways forward in embedding CPTED in design and planning processes.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Built Environment, 39(1), p. 74-91
Publisher: Alexandrine Press
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 0263-7960
Field of Research (FOR): 160201 Causes and Prevention of Crime
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 10
Views: 7
Downloads: 3
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
5 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/SOURCE02.pdfPost-peer review version297.08 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Nov 26, 2018

Page view(s)

48
checked on May 2, 2019

Download(s)

24
checked on May 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.