| Author(s) |
Doolan, Kathleen
ter Veer-Burke, Stacey
Bizo, Lewis
McEwan, James
|
| Publication Date |
2015
|
| Abstract |
Research shows that reinforcement of variable responding facilitates sequence learning in rats but may interfere with sequence learning in humans. Experiment 1 examined sequence difficulty in humans by manipulating sequence length and task instruction. Experiment 2 investigated the effect of removing or adding a variability contingency within the experimental session for a 6-item sequence. Participants were allocated to either a Control or Variable group. The Control group only received reinforcement for production of the target sequences. The Variability group received reinforcers on a Variable Interval 60-s schedule if the sequence met a variability criterion and for production of the target sequence. In Experiment 2 after 10 reinforcer deliveries the variability contingency was either removed or added. In Experiment 1, the Control group produced more target sequences for the 6-digit conditions, the Variable group produced more target sequences for the 9-digit condition and there was no difference between groups for the 12-digit condition. Task instructions had little impact on the results. In Experiment 2 the Control performed better than the Variability group - addition or removal of the variability contingency had little effect on performance. Results will be discussed in relation to previously published research on sequence learning with animals and humans.
|
| Citation |
Association for Behavior Analysis International 41st Annual Convention Program
|
| Link | |
| Language |
en
|
| Publisher |
Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI)
|
| Title |
The Role of a Variability Contingency on Sequence Learning in Humans
|
| Type of document |
Conference Publication
|
| Entity Type |
Publication
|
| Name | Size | format | Description | Link |
|---|