Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning

Title
Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning
Publication Date
2009
Author(s)
Klein, Carissa
Wilson, Kerrie
Watts, Matthew
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9094-1335
Email: mwatts24@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mwatts24
Stein, Janet
Berry, Sandra
Carwardine, Josie
Stafford Smith, Mark
Mackey, Brendan
Possingham, Hugh P
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Place of publication
United States of America
DOI
10.1890/07-1684.1
UNE publication id
une:21306
Abstract
Systematic conservation planning research has focused on designing systems of conservation areas that efficiently protect a comprehensive and representative set of species and habitats. Recently, there has been an emphasis on improving the adequacy of conservation area design to promote the persistence and future generation of biodiversity. Few studies have explored incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into conservation planning assessments. Biodiversity in Australia is maintained and generated by numerous ecological and evolutionary processes at various spatial and temporal scales. We accommodated ecological and evolutionary processes in four ways: (1) using sub-catchments as planning units to facilitate the protection of the integrity and function of ecosystem processes occurring on a sub-catchment scale; (2) targeting one type of ecological refugia, drought refugia, which are critical for the persistence of many species during widespread drought; (3) targeting one type of evolutionary refugia which are important for maintaining and generating unique biota during long-term climatic changes; and (4) preferentially grouping priority areas along vegetated waterways to account for the importance of connected waterways and associated riparian areas in maintaining processes. We identified drought refugia, areas of relatively high and regular herbage production in arid and semiarid Australia, from estimates of gross primary productivity derived from satellite data. In this paper, we combined the novel incorporation of these processes with a more traditional framework of efficiently representing a comprehensive sample of biodiversity to identify spatial priorities across Australia. We explored the trade-offs between economic costs, representation targets, and connectivity. Priority areas that considered ecological and evolutionary processes were more connected along vegetated waterways and were identified for a small increase in economic cost. Priority areas for conservation investment are more likely to have long-term benefits to biodiversity if ecological and evolutionary processes are considered in their identification.
Link
Citation
Ecological Applications, 19(1), p. 206-217
ISSN
1939-5582
1051-0761
Start page
206
End page
217

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink