Executive compensation among Australian mining and non-mining firms: Risk taking, long and short-term incentives

Title
Executive compensation among Australian mining and non-mining firms: Risk taking, long and short-term incentives
Publication Date
2017
Author(s)
Yarram, Subba Reddy
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9209-3499
Email: syarram@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:syarram
Rice, John
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-4424
Email: jrice6@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jrice6
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Place of publication
Netherlands
DOI
10.1016/j.econmod.2017.03.034
UNE publication id
une:21292
Abstract
How firms determine the pay of their executive employees is a vital research area. In the Australian context, mining firms form a large portion of listed companies. These miners tend to have more volatile earnings, operate with less certainty and higher risk in relation to capital investment. We look at a sample of ASX listed miners and non-miners from 2005 to 2013. We note that miners pay their CEOs less (AUD 1 m vs AUD 1.5 m for non-miners) overall. However, we also note that miners tend to use enhanced contingent long-term remuneration arrangements to significantly boost the pay-performance relationship compared to non-miners particularly during the pre-GFC period. Curiously, non-miners tend to have more generous short-term contingent arrangements linking executive pay and performance. The GFC, as an event, has adversely impacted these arrangements, lessening the generosity of pay-performance among miners, while enhancing these arrangements among non-miners. Overall, the results of the study provide support for optimal contracting theory and do not generally support the managerial power approach for both mining and non-mining firms.
Link
Citation
Economic Modelling, v.64, p. 211-220
ISSN
1873-6122
0264-9993
Start page
211
End page
220

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink