Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/20284
Title: Finding our way: On the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia
Contributor(s): Campbell, Hamish  (author); Beyer, Hawthorne L (author); Richardson, Craig (author); Rodgers, Essie (author); Taylor, Graeme (author); Watts, Matthew (author)orcid ; Westcott, David A (author); Dennis, Todd E (author); Dwyer, Ross G (author); Forester, James D (author); Fukuda, Yusuke (author); Lynch, Catherine (author); Hindell, Mark A (author); Menke, Norbert (author); Morales, Juan M (author)
Publication Date: 2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.089
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/20284
Abstract: The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Science of the Total Environment, v.534, p. 79-84
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Place of Publication: Netherlands
ISSN: 1879-1026
0048-9697
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 050299 Environmental Science and Management not elsewhere classified
080605 Decision Support and Group Support Systems
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410199 Climate change impacts and adaptation not elsewhere classified
460507 Information extraction and fusion
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960599 Ecosystem Assessment and Management not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 189999 Other environmental management not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

32
checked on May 25, 2024

Page view(s)

1,152
checked on May 26, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.