Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Baseline and greenhouse-gas emissions in extensive livestock enterprises, with a case study of feeding lipid to beef cattle||Contributor(s):||Herd, Robert M (author) ; Oddy, Hutton (author) ; Bray, Steven (author)||Publication Date:||2015||DOI:||10.1071/an14222||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/20080||Abstract:||For accurate calculation of reductions in greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions, methodologies under the Australian Government's Carbon Farming Initiative (CFI) depend on a valid assessment of the baseline and project emissions. Life-cycle assessments (LCAs) clearly show that enteric methane emitted from the rumen of cattle and sheep is the major source of GHG emissions from livestock enterprises. Where a historic baseline for a CFI methodology for livestock is required, the use of simulated data for cow-calf enterprises at six sites in southern Australia demonstrated that a 5-year rolling emission average will provide an acceptable trade off in terms of accuracy and stability, but this is a much shorter time period than typically used for LCA. For many CFI livestock methodologies, comparative or pair-wise baselines are potentially more appropriate than historic baselines. A case study of lipid supplementation of beef cows over winter is presented. The case study of a control herd of 250 cows used a comparative baseline derived from simple data on livestock numbers and class of livestock to quantify the emission abatement. Compared with the control herd, lipid supplementation to cows over winter increased livestock productivity, total livestock production and enterprise GHG emissions from 990 t CO₂-e to 1022 t CO₂-e. Energy embodied in the supplement and extra diesel used in transporting the supplement diminished the enteric-methane abatement benefit of lipid supplementation. Reducing the cow herd to 238 cows maintained the level of livestock production of the control herd and reduced enterprise emissions to 938 t CO₂-e, but was not cost effective under the assumptions of this case study.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Animal Production Science, 55(2), p. 159-165||Publisher:||CSIRO Publishing||Place of Publication:||Australia||ISSN:||1836-5787
|Field of Research (FOR):||070203 Animal Management||Socio-Economic Outcome Codes:||960302 Climate Change Mitigation Strategies||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 91
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
checked on Nov 30, 2018
checked on Mar 5, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.