Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Proxies to adjust methane production rate of beef cattle when the quantity of feed consumed is unknown
Contributor(s): Herd, Robert M  (author)orcid ; Velazco, J I (author); Arthur, P F (author); Hegarty, Roger  (author)
Publication Date: 2016
DOI: 10.1071/an15477
Handle Link:
Abstract: The aim of the present experiment was to evaluate the utility of carbon dioxide production rate (CPR; g CO₂/ day) and animal weight (WT) data as proxies for feed intake to adjust methane production rate (MPR; g CH₄/day) in situations where dry-matter intake (DMI) is not known. This experiment measured individual-animal DMI, MPR and CPR in the feedlot, and then again on restricted quantities of grain and roughage diets in open-circuit respiration chambers. Of the 59 cattle tested in the feedlot, 41 had MPR and CPR recorded, and 59 and 57 had test results on the restricted grain and roughage rations. Methane production relative to DMI by individual animals was calculated as CH₄ yield (MY; MPR/ DMI) and as residual CH₄ production (RMPDMI; calculated as MPR less predicted MPR based on DMI). A second form of RMP: RMPCO₂ , was calculated by regressing MPR against CPR to determine whether animals were producing more or less CH₄ than predicted for their CPR. Carbon dioxide production rate was positively associated with DMI in all three test phases (R2 = 0.25, 0.45 and 0.47; all P < 0.001). The associations for MY with MPR : CPR were moderate and positive, as follows: R2 = 0.49 in the feedlot test; R2 = 0.37 in the restricted-grain test; and R2 = 0.59 in the restricted-roughage test, and with RMPCO₂ , values of R2 were 0.57, 0.34 and 0.59 in the three test phases (all P < 0.001). The R2 for RMPDMI with MPR : CPR in all three tests were 0.50, 0.79 and 0.69, and with RMPCO₂ , values of R2 were 0.68, 0.79 and 0.68 (all P < 0.001). The high R2 for MY with MPR : CPR and RMPCO2 and even higher R2 for RMPDMI with MPR : CPR and RMPCO₂ in all three test phases showed that CPR can be used to adjust MPR data for DMI when DMI is not recorded. In the feedlot test, where animal WT data were recorded over 70 days, MPR adjusted for WT and WT gain had R2 with MY and RMPDMI of 0.60 and 0.83, respectively (P < 0.001), offering the possibility that animal WT data determined over an extended time period could also be used as a proxy for DMI in adjustment of MPR.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Animal Production Science, 56(3), p. 231-237
Publisher: CSIRO Publishing
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1836-5787
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 070204 Animal Nutrition
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300303 Animal nutrition
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 830301 Beef Cattle
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 100401 Beef cattle
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record


checked on Apr 6, 2024

Page view(s)

checked on Feb 11, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM



Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.