Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19825
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCharmley, Een
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, S R Oen
dc.contributor.authorMoate, P Jen
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, Rogeren
dc.contributor.authorHerd, Robert Men
dc.contributor.authorOddy, Huttonen
dc.contributor.authorReyenga, Pen
dc.contributor.authorStaunton, K Men
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Aen
dc.contributor.authorHannah, M Cen
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-13T14:22:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Production Science, 56(3), p. 169-180en
dc.identifier.issn1836-5787en
dc.identifier.issn1836-0939en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19825-
dc.description.abstractThe methods for estimating methane emissions from cattle as used in the Australian national inventory are based on older data that have now been superseded by a large amount of more recent data. Recent data suggested that the current inventory emissions estimates can be improved. To address this issue, a total of 1034 individual animal records of daily methane production (MP) was used to reassess the relationship between MP and each of dry matter intake (DMI) and gross energy intake (GEI). Data were restricted to trials conducted in the past 10 years using open-circuit respiration chambers, with cattle fed forage-based diets (forage >70%). Results from diets considered to inhibit methanogenesis were omitted from the dataset. Records were obtained from dairy cattle fed temperate forages (220 records), beef cattle fed temperate forages (680 records) and beef cattle fed tropical forages (133 records). Relationships were very similar for all three production categories and single relationships for MP on a DMI or GEI basis were proposed for national inventory purposes. These relationships were MP (g/day) = 20.7 (±0.28) x DMI (kg/day) (R² = 0.92, P < 0.001) and MP (MJ/day) = 0.063 (±0.008)x GEI (MJ/day) (R² = 0.93, P < 0.001). If the revised MP (g/day) approach is used to calculate Australia's national inventory, it will reduce estimates of emissions of forage-fed cattle by 24%. Assuming a global warming potential of 25 for methane, this represents a 12.6 Mt CO₂-e reduction in calculated annual emissions from Australian cattle.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Production Scienceen
dc.titleA universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australiaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/an15365en
dcterms.accessRightsGolden
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Nutritionen
local.contributor.firstnameEen
local.contributor.firstnameS R Oen
local.contributor.firstnameP Jen
local.contributor.firstnameRogeren
local.contributor.firstnameRobert Men
local.contributor.firstnameHuttonen
local.contributor.firstnamePen
local.contributor.firstnameK Men
local.contributor.firstnameAen
local.contributor.firstnameM Cen
local.subject.for2008070204 Animal Nutritionen
local.subject.seo2008960302 Climate Change Mitigation Strategiesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailrhegart3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrherd3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailhoddy2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20161114-160356en
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage169en
local.format.endpage180en
local.identifier.scopusid84958211645en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume56en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameCharmleyen
local.contributor.lastnameWilliamsen
local.contributor.lastnameMoateen
local.contributor.lastnameHegartyen
local.contributor.lastnameHerden
local.contributor.lastnameOddyen
local.contributor.lastnameReyengaen
local.contributor.lastnameStauntonen
local.contributor.lastnameAndersonen
local.contributor.lastnameHannahen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rhegart3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rherd3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:hoddy2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-4689-5519en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-1783-1049en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:20017en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleA universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australiaen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorCharmley, Een
local.search.authorWilliams, S R Oen
local.search.authorMoate, P Jen
local.search.authorHegarty, Rogeren
local.search.authorHerd, Robert Men
local.search.authorOddy, Huttonen
local.search.authorReyenga, Pen
local.search.authorStaunton, K Men
local.search.authorAnderson, Aen
local.search.authorHannah, M Cen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.year.published2016en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/123089a5-c2b4-4898-9328-1dc690588d15en
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020190301 Climate change mitigation strategiesen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

144
checked on Mar 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,386
checked on Mar 10, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.