Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia||Contributor(s):||Charmley, E (author); Williams, S R O (author); Moate, P J (author); Hegarty, Roger (author); Herd, Robert M (author) ; Oddy, Hutton (author) ; Reyenga, P (author); Staunton, K M (author); Anderson, A (author); Hannah, M C (author)||Publication Date:||2016||Open Access:||Yes||DOI:||10.1071/an15365||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19825||Abstract:||The methods for estimating methane emissions from cattle as used in the Australian national inventory are based on older data that have now been superseded by a large amount of more recent data. Recent data suggested that the current inventory emissions estimates can be improved. To address this issue, a total of 1034 individual animal records of daily methane production (MP) was used to reassess the relationship between MP and each of dry matter intake (DMI) and gross energy intake (GEI). Data were restricted to trials conducted in the past 10 years using open-circuit respiration chambers, with cattle fed forage-based diets (forage >70%). Results from diets considered to inhibit methanogenesis were omitted from the dataset. Records were obtained from dairy cattle fed temperate forages (220 records), beef cattle fed temperate forages (680 records) and beef cattle fed tropical forages (133 records). Relationships were very similar for all three production categories and single relationships for MP on a DMI or GEI basis were proposed for national inventory purposes. These relationships were MP (g/day) = 20.7 (±0.28) x DMI (kg/day) (R² = 0.92, P < 0.001) and MP (MJ/day) = 0.063 (±0.008)x GEI (MJ/day) (R² = 0.93, P < 0.001). If the revised MP (g/day) approach is used to calculate Australia's national inventory, it will reduce estimates of emissions of forage-fed cattle by 24%. Assuming a global warming potential of 25 for methane, this represents a 12.6 Mt CO₂-e reduction in calculated annual emissions from Australian cattle.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Animal Production Science, 56(3), p. 169-180||Publisher:||CSIRO Publishing||Place of Publication:||Clayton, Australia||ISSN:||1836-0939
|Field of Research (FOR):||070204 Animal Nutrition||Socio-Economic Outcome Codes:||960302 Climate Change Mitigation Strategies||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 100
|Appears in Collections:||Journal Article|
Files in This Item:
checked on Nov 30, 2018
checked on Dec 29, 2018
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.