Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19734
Title: Fear and coping styles of outdoor-preferring, moderate-outdoor and indoor-preferring free-range laying hens
Contributor(s): Campbell, Dana  (author); Hinch, Geoffrey  (author)orcid ; Downing, Jeff A (author); Lee, Caroline  (author)
Publication Date: 2016
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.004
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19734
Abstract: Free-range systems are increasing in popularity as outdoor access is perceived to improve hen welfare, but radio-frequency identification tracking of individuals shows not all hens access the range daily with some hens never going outside. The individual variation in range use may be correlated with individual differences in fear and coping styles. In this study, tests of tonic immobility, manual restraint (coupled with plasma corticosterone responses) and open field were applied to ISA Brown hens ('Gallus gallus domesticus': n = 104) at 37-39 weeks of age. Focal hens were selected as categorised into three different range access groups based on the percentage of available days across the trial period that they went outdoors: indoor-preferring (accessed the range on 0-10% of available days), moderate-outdoor (accessed the range on 30-60% of available days), and outdoor-preferring (accessed the range on 100% of available days). The indoor-preferring hens produced fewer vocalisations during manual restraint compared to the moderate-outdoor and outdoor-preferring hens (P = 0.004) and tended to be slower to vocalise (P = 0.08) but no differences were found in latency to first struggle (P = 0.55), number of struggles (P = 0.44) or plasma corticosterone responses (P = 0.82). During the open field tests, the indoor-preferring and moderate-outdoor hens showed longer latencies to move and fewer squares were crossed compared to outdoor-preferring hens (P ≤ 0.009) but no differences were found in latency to first vocalise (P = 0.72) and total number of vocalisations (P = 0.91). There were no differences between range access groups in duration of tonic immobility (P = 0.14). These results show indoor-preferring hens have elevated fear levels, and a possible behavioural indication of a different coping style compared to outdoor-preferring hens, but the inconsistent results within the moderate-outdoor range access group warrant further investigation.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Applied Animal Behaviour Science, v.185, p. 73-77
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Place of Publication: The Netherlands
ISSN: 1872-9045
0168-1591
Field of Research (FOR): 070206 Animal Reproduction
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 45
Views: 42
Downloads: 5
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
5 files
File Description SizeFormat 
open/SOURCE02.pdfPre-peer review version545.39 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Nov 30, 2018

Page view(s)

84
checked on Dec 29, 2018

Download(s)

14
checked on Dec 29, 2018
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.