Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19504
Title: Assessing collaborative, privately managed biodiversity conservation derived from an offsets program: Lessons from the Southern Mallee of New South Wales, Australia
Contributor(s): Drielsma, Michael  (author); Foster, Else (author); Ellis, Murray (author); Gill, Roderic A (author); Prior, Julian C  (author); Kumar, Lalit  (author)orcid ; Saremi, Hanieh  (author); Ferrier, Simon (author)
Publication Date: 2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.005
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19504
Abstract: Conservation effort needs to be integrated across whole regions, to include all landuses and tenures; and engage owners, managers and other interest groups. Where conditions are conducive, multi-stakeholder collaboration offers the advantages of averting conflict. It also offers a platform for the development of a shared vision for a region, and a common space for generating synergistic, place-specific innovations to achieve that vision. Spatial modelling assists in the process, evaluating and visualizing cumulative impacts arising from sets of landuse and management changes across a region. The Southern Mallee Guidelines was an offset scheme in the Southern Mallee region of NSW, Australia, developed to address jointly the agricultural development and biodiversity conservation concerns in the region. The scheme provided a timely example of place-specific response to tackling the complexity of land clearing in Australia, as policy makers were searching for alternatives to top-down regulation. At the close of the scheme, we applied a scenario-based, regional biodiversity evaluation tool known as Conservation Options in Regional Environments (CORE). It was developed to evaluate the cumulative impacts of development and conservation measures arising from the scheme. CORE is also useful as a learning and engagement tool. CORE combined a vegetation community-based evaluation, and a fauna species and functional fauna group evaluation based on metapopulation dynamics theory. Using this tool, we found that with some qualifications, the scheme broadly maintained overall biodiversity persistence in the region.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Land Use Policy, v.59, p. 59-70
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1873-5754
0264-8377
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 050205 Environmental Management
050102 Ecosystem Function
050202 Conservation and Biodiversity
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410404 Environmental management
410203 Ecosystem function
410401 Conservation and biodiversity
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960805 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scales
960501 Ecosystem Assessment and Management at Regional or Larger Scales
960510 Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Sparseland, Permanent Grassland and Arid Zone Environments
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180403 Assessment and management of Antarctic and Southern Ocean ecosystems
180601 Assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystems
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Nov 9, 2024

Page view(s)

2,680
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Apr 28, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.