Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19415
Title: Representing Democracy or Reinforcing Inequality?: Electoral Distribution and 'McGinty v Western Australia'
Contributor(s): Carne, Greg (author)
Publication Date: 1997
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/19415
Open Access Link: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/download.cgi/au/journals/FedLawRw/1997/14
Abstract: 'McGinty v Western Australia' is a significant indicator of present and prospective attitudes of the High Court to major issues of representative democracy, such as electoral representation and equality. In affirming by a majority that substantial numerical voter inequality in Western Australian state electorates did not infringe a concept of representative democracy in either the Commonwealth or the Western Australian constitutions, the court went beyond a refusal to overturn AG (Cth); 'Ex Rel McKinlay v Commonwealth' of more than twenty years earlier.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Federal Law Review, 25(2), p. 351-383
Publisher: Australian National University
Place of Publication: Canberra, Australia
ISSN: 1444-6928
0067-205X
Field of Research (FOR): 180108 Constitutional Law
180114 Human Rights Law
180120 Legal Institutions (incl. Courts and Justice Systems)
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 40
Views: 46
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Dec 29, 2018
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.