Admissibility of Expert Evidence

Title
Admissibility of Expert Evidence
Publication Date
2014
Author(s)
Mallett, Xanthe
Editor
Editor(s): Xanthe Mallett, Teri Blythe, Rachel Berry
Type of document
Book Chapter
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
CRC Press
Place of publication
Boca Raton, United States of America
Edition
1
DOI
10.1201/b16509-20
UNE publication id
une:19460
Abstract
The significance of the concept of reliability cannot be overestimated in a criminal trial, particularly in relation to the presentation of evidence, and this is even more pressing when scientific methods and the evidence produced are of a highly technical or specialised nature, to help a jury reach a decision on the guilt of a defendant/s. All courts are governed by rules that detail what types of evidence are admissible. One key aspect for the admission of evidence is whether it proves, or helps prove, a fact or issue in that case. Here we will consider the current approaches to courtroom admissibility of expert evidence in the United States and England and Wales, in light of recent reports that have aimed to highlight and offer solutions to some of the ongoing problems. There are two types of witnesses who proffer evidence in a trial: lay witnesses, who speak only of their own experiences, and experts, who are called upon to assist the jury understand the evidence being presented to them.
Link
Citation
Advances in Forensic Human Identification, p. 337-350
ISBN
9781439825143
9781439825167
Start page
337
End page
350

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink