Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Selection for productivity and robustness traits in pigs||Contributor(s):||Hermesch, Susanne (author) ; Li, Li (author) ; Doeschl-Wilson, A B (author); Gilbert, H (author)||Publication Date:||2015||DOI:||10.1071/an15275||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18907||Abstract:||Pig breeding programs worldwide continue to focus on both productivity and robustness. This selection emphasis has to be accompanied by provision of better-quality environments to pigs to improve performance and to enhance health and welfare of pigs. Definition of broader breeding objectives that include robustness traits in addition to production traits is the first step in the development of selection strategies for productivity and robustness. An approach has been presented which facilitates extension of breeding objectives. Post-weaning survival, maternal genetic effects for growth as an indicator of health status and sow mature weight are examples of robustness traits. Further, breeding objectives should be defined for commercial environments and selection indexes should account for genotype by environment interactions (GxE). Average performances of groups of pigs have been used to quantify the additive effects of multiple environmental factors on performance of pigs. For growth, GxE existed when environments differed by 60 g/day between groups of pigs. This environmental variation was observed even on well managed farms. Selection for improved health of pigs should focus on disease resistance to indirectly reduce pathogen loads on farms and on disease resilience to improve the ability of pigs to cope with infection challenges. Traits defining disease resilience may be based on performance and immune measures, disease incidence or survival rates of pigs. Residual feed intake is a trait that quantifies feed efficiency. The responses of divergent selection lines for residual feed intake to various environmental challenges were often similar or even favourable for the more efficient, low residual feed intake line. These somewhat unexpected results highlight the need to gain a better understanding of the metabolic differences between more or less productive pigs. These physiological differences lead to interactions between the genetic potential of pigs for productivity and robustness and the prevalence of specific environmental conditions.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Animal Production Science, 55(11-12), p. 1437-1447||Publisher:||CSIRO Publishing||Place of Publication:||Australia||ISSN:||1836-5787
|Field of Research (FoR) 2008:||070201 Animal Breeding||Field of Research (FoR) 2020:||300305 Animal reproduction and breeding||Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008:||830308 Pigs||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 75|
|Appears in Collections:||Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU)|
Files in This Item:
checked on Sep 27, 2021
checked on Mar 4, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.