Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18878
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWyer, Maryen
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Debraen
dc.contributor.authorIedema, Ricken
dc.contributor.authorHor, Su-Yinen
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Gwendolyn Len
dc.contributor.authorJorm, Christineen
dc.contributor.authorHooker, Claireen
dc.contributor.authorO'Sullivan, Matthew Vincent Neilen
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Katherineen
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-13T15:12:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Nursing, 24(11-12), p. 1718-1729en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2702en
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18878-
dc.description.abstractAims and Objectives. This paper explores patients' perspectives on infection prevention and control. Background. Healthcare-associated infections are the most frequent adverse event experienced by patients. Reduction strategies have predominantly addressed frontline clinicians' practices; patients' roles have been less explored. Design. Video-reflexive ethnography. Methods. Fieldwork undertaken at a large metropolitan hospital in Australia involved 300 hours of ethnographic observations, including 11 hours of video footage. This paper focuses on eight occasions, where video footage was shown back to patients in one-on-one reflexive sessions. Findings. Viewing and discussing video footage of clinical care enabled patients to become articulate about infection risks, and to identify their own roles in reducing transmission. Barriers to detailed understandings of preventative practices and their roles included lack of conversation between patients and clinicians about infection prevention and control, and being ignored or contradicted when challenging perceived suboptimal practice. It became evident that to compensate for clinicians' lack of engagement around infection control, participants had developed a range of strategies, of variable effectiveness, to protect themselves and others. Finally, the reflexive process engendered closer scrutiny and a more critical attitude to infection control that increased patients' sense of agency. Conclusion. This study found that patients actively contribute to their own safety. Their success, however, depends on the quality of patient-provider relationships and conversations. Rather than treating patients as passive recipients of infection control practices, clinicians can support and engage with patients' contributions towards achieving safer care. Relevance to clinical practice. This study suggests that if clinicians seek to reduce infection rates, they must start to consider patients as active contributors to infection control. Clinicians can engage patients in conversations about practices and pay attention to patient feedback about infection risk. This will broaden clinicians' understandings of infection control risks and behaviours, and assist them to support appropriate patient self-care behaviour.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Nursingen
dc.titleInvolving patients in understanding hospital infection control using visual methodsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.12779en
dc.subject.keywordsNursingen
local.contributor.firstnameMaryen
local.contributor.firstnameDebraen
local.contributor.firstnameRicken
local.contributor.firstnameSu-Yinen
local.contributor.firstnameGwendolyn Len
local.contributor.firstnameChristineen
local.contributor.firstnameClaireen
local.contributor.firstnameMatthew Vincent Neilen
local.contributor.firstnameKatherineen
local.subject.for2008111099 Nursing not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008920210 Nursingen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Healthen
local.profile.emaildjackso4@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20160330-154655en
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage1718en
local.format.endpage1729en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume24en
local.identifier.issue11-12en
local.contributor.lastnameWyeren
local.contributor.lastnameJacksonen
local.contributor.lastnameIedemaen
local.contributor.lastnameHoren
local.contributor.lastnameGilberten
local.contributor.lastnameJormen
local.contributor.lastnameHookeren
local.contributor.lastnameO'Sullivanen
local.contributor.lastnameCarrollen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:djackso4en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:19080en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleInvolving patients in understanding hospital infection control using visual methodsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorWyer, Maryen
local.search.authorJackson, Debraen
local.search.authorIedema, Ricken
local.search.authorHor, Su-Yinen
local.search.authorGilbert, Gwendolyn Len
local.search.authorJorm, Christineen
local.search.authorHooker, Claireen
local.search.authorO'Sullivan, Matthew Vincent Neilen
local.search.authorCarroll, Katherineen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000355331300028en
local.year.published2015en
local.subject.for2020420599 Nursing not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2020200307 Nursingen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

31
checked on Jan 13, 2024

Page view(s)

1,202
checked on Jan 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.