Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18639
Title: Conclusion
Contributor(s): Quirico, Ottavio  (author); Boumghar, Mouloud (author)
Publication Date: 2016
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18639
Abstract: A positivist-oriented legal analysis of climate change and human rights shows that relevant theoretical and practical obstacles currently determine a divide between the two poles of the relationship. To a certain extent, climate change policies may already be interpreted as human rights measures, but only marginally can it be said that they are informed by fundamental claims. Key substantive and institutional issues hamper the possibility of tearing down the 'wall'.
Publication Type: Book Chapter
Source of Publication: Climate Change and Human Rights: An international and comparative law perspective, p. 337-338
Publisher: Routledge
Place of Publication: Abingdon, United Kingdom
ISBN: 9781315767185
9781138783218
Field of Research (FOR): 180111 Environmental and Natural Resources Law
180114 Human Rights Law
180116 International Law (excl. International Trade Law)
Socio-Economic Outcome Codes: 949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified
HERDC Category Description: B2 Chapter in a Book - Other
Other Links: http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/192766309
Series Name: Routledge Research in International Environmental Law
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 181
Views: 181
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

172
checked on May 3, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.