Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18639| Title: | Conclusion | Contributor(s): | Quirico, Ottavio (author); Boumghar, Mouloud (author) | Publication Date: | 2016 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18639 | Abstract: | A positivist-oriented legal analysis of climate change and human rights shows that relevant theoretical and practical obstacles currently determine a divide between the two poles of the relationship. To a certain extent, climate change policies may already be interpreted as human rights measures, but only marginally can it be said that they are informed by fundamental claims. Key substantive and institutional issues hamper the possibility of tearing down the 'wall'. | Publication Type: | Book Chapter | Source of Publication: | Climate Change and Human Rights: An international and comparative law perspective, p. 337-338 | Publisher: | Routledge | Place of Publication: | Abingdon, United Kingdom | ISBN: | 9781315767185 9781138783218 |
Field of Research (FOR): | 180111 Environmental and Natural Resources Law 180114 Human Rights Law 180116 International Law (excl. International Trade Law) |
Socio-Economic Outcome Codes: | 949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified | HERDC Category Description: | B2 Chapter in a Book - Other | Other Links: | http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/192766309 | Series Name: | Routledge Research in International Environmental Law | Statistics to Oct 2018: | Visitors: 181 Views: 181 Downloads: 0 |
| Appears in Collections: | Book Chapter |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|
Page view(s)
172
checked on May 3, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.