Adaptive cycles of floodplain vegetation response to flooding and drying

Title
Adaptive cycles of floodplain vegetation response to flooding and drying
Publication Date
2016
Author(s)
Thapa, Rajesh
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5931-7147
Email: rthapa4@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:rthapa4
Thoms, Martin
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-0476
Email: mthoms2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mthoms2
Parsons, Melissa
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-7306
Email: mparson@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mparson
Reid, Michael
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-9347
Email: mreid24@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mreid24
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Place of publication
Germany
DOI
10.5194/esurf-4-175-2016
UNE publication id
une:18681
Abstract
Flooding is a key driver of floodplain vegetation productivity. Adaptive cycles provide a model for examining the productivity of semi-arid floodplain vegetation in response to hydrology. We examined the response of vegetation productivity (measured as NDVI) 5 through a hypothesized adaptive cycle to determine if the cycle repeats over time and how it is affected by different sized flood events. The area of floodplain inundation was associated with an adaptive cycle that repeated in four flood events through phases of wetting (exploitation phase), wet (conservation phase), drying (release phase) and dry (reorganisation phase). Vegetation productivity responses corresponded to these 10 phases. The area and quality of floodplain vegetation productivity followed the hypothesised pattern of higher quality vegetation vigour in the wetting and wet phases, lower vigour in the drying phase and lowest vigour in the dry phase. There were more transitions between NDVI classes in the wet phase, which was dominated by two-way transitions. Overall, the wetting, wet and drying phases were dominated by smaller probability class changes, whereas in the dry phase higher probability class changes were more prominent. Although the four flood events exhibited an adaptive cycle the duration of the adaptive cycle phases, and the nature of vegetation productivity response, differed with the character of the flood event. Vegetation response in two of the adaptive cycle phases - the release and reorganisation phases - were as hypothesised, but 20 in the exploitation and conservation phases changes in vegetation productivity were more dynamic. The character of vegetation response through the adaptive cycle also indicates that semi-arid floodplain vegetation productivity is more vulnerable to changing state during the conservation and release phases and not during the exploitation and reorganisation phases as resilience theory suggests. Overall, the adaptive cycle 25 represents a new model to improve our understanding of the complexity of change in semi-arid floodplain vegetation productivity through cycles of flooding and drying.
Link
Citation
Earth Surface Dynamics, v.4, p. 175-191
ISSN
2196-632X
2196-6311
Start page
175
End page
191

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink