Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18478
Title: Adaptive cycles of floodplain vegetation response to flooding and drying
Contributor(s): Thapa, Rajesh  (author)orcid ; Thoms, Martin  (author)orcid ; Parsons, Melissa  (author)orcid ; Reid, Michael  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2016
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-4-175-2016Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18478
Abstract: Flooding is a key driver of floodplain vegetation productivity. Adaptive cycles provide a model for examining the productivity of semi-arid floodplain vegetation in response to hydrology. We examined the response of vegetation productivity (measured as NDVI) 5 through a hypothesized adaptive cycle to determine if the cycle repeats over time and how it is affected by different sized flood events. The area of floodplain inundation was associated with an adaptive cycle that repeated in four flood events through phases of wetting (exploitation phase), wet (conservation phase), drying (release phase) and dry (reorganisation phase). Vegetation productivity responses corresponded to these 10 phases. The area and quality of floodplain vegetation productivity followed the hypothesised pattern of higher quality vegetation vigour in the wetting and wet phases, lower vigour in the drying phase and lowest vigour in the dry phase. There were more transitions between NDVI classes in the wet phase, which was dominated by two-way transitions. Overall, the wetting, wet and drying phases were dominated by smaller probability class changes, whereas in the dry phase higher probability class changes were more prominent. Although the four flood events exhibited an adaptive cycle the duration of the adaptive cycle phases, and the nature of vegetation productivity response, differed with the character of the flood event. Vegetation response in two of the adaptive cycle phases - the release and reorganisation phases - were as hypothesised, but 20 in the exploitation and conservation phases changes in vegetation productivity were more dynamic. The character of vegetation response through the adaptive cycle also indicates that semi-arid floodplain vegetation productivity is more vulnerable to changing state during the conservation and release phases and not during the exploitation and reorganisation phases as resilience theory suggests. Overall, the adaptive cycle 25 represents a new model to improve our understanding of the complexity of change in semi-arid floodplain vegetation productivity through cycles of flooding and drying.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Earth Surface Dynamics, v.4, p. 175-191
Publisher: Copernicus GmbH
Place of Publication: Germany
ISSN: 2196-632X
2196-6311
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 040699 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience not elsewhere classified
040607 Surface Processes
059999 Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 370901 Geomorphology and earth surface processes
370702 Ecohydrology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960913 Water Allocation and Quantification
970105 Expanding Knowledge in the Environmental Sciences
970104 Expanding Knowledge in the Earth Sciences
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180307 Rehabilitation or conservation of fresh, ground and surface water environments
190211 Water policy (incl. water allocation)
280111 Expanding knowledge in the environmental sciences
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Oct 12, 2024

Page view(s)

1,572
checked on Nov 12, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.