Did the Big Stick Work? An Empirical Assessment of Scale Economies and the Queensland Forced Amalgamation Program

Title
Did the Big Stick Work? An Empirical Assessment of Scale Economies and the Queensland Forced Amalgamation Program
Publication Date
2016
Author(s)
Drew, Joseph
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-5758
Email: jdrew2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jdrew2
Kortt, Michael A
Dollery, Brian E
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Routledge
Place of publication
United Kingdom
DOI
10.1080/03003930.2013.874341
UNE publication id
une:18529
Abstract
In 2007, the Queensland Government imposed forced amalgamation with the number of local authorities falling from 157 to just 73 councils. Amalgamation was based inter alia on the assumption that increased economies of scale would generate savings. This paper empirically examines pre- and post-amalgamation (2006/07 and 2009/10) for scale economies. For the 2006/07 data, evidence of economies of scale was found for councils with populations up to 98,000, and thereafter diseconomies of scale. Eight percent of councils in 2006/07 (ten councils) - representing 64% of the state's population - exhibited diseconomies of scale. For the 2009/10 data, the average cost curve remained almost stationary at 99,000 residents per council, but almost 25% of all councils (thirteen councils) were now found to exhibit diseconomies of scale. The compulsory merger program thus increased the proportion of Queensland residents in councils operating with diseconomies of scale to 84%.
Link
Citation
Local Government Studies, 42(1), p. 1-14
ISSN
1743-9388
0300-3930
Start page
1
End page
14

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink