Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18081
Title: Intercomparison dripper testing within the INITL
Contributor(s): Koech, Richard  (author); Molle, Bruno (author); Pires de Camargo, Antonio (author); Dimaiolo, Pascal (author); Audouard, Mathieu (author); Saretta, Ezequiel (author); Frizzone, Jose Antonio (author); Pezzaniti, David (author); Benhu, Gao (author)
Publication Date: 2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.08.003
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/18081
Abstract: The International Network of Irrigation Testing Laboratories (INITL) undertook a laboratory inter-comparison testing exercise of three sets of drippers in the period 2013 and 2014. The four testing facilities that participated in this exercise are based in following countries: Australia, Brazil, France and China. The objective of the testing programme was to compare results from different independent testing facilities to enable individual laboratories identify potential opportunities for improvement of their performances. This would also facilitate the INITL to make proposals for harmonisation of the testing methods. The maximum coefficient of variation, cᶹ, at the manufacturer's recommended operating pressure of 100 kPa, was found to be 3.76%, which was significantly smaller than the 7% recommended by ISO 9261 [5] as the maximum allowable variation of the flow rate of the test sample. The emitter exponent was determined to be approximately 0.5 which is consistent with results obtained from past studies. At the operating pressure of 100 kPa, it was found that although the average flow rates from the participating laboratories were similar, there was a difference in the dispersion of data. Datasets for the 4 Lh‾¹ dripper model fitted a normal distribution model, while on the other hand, some data sets for the 2 and 8 Lh‾¹ dripper models were not normally distributed. A higher dispersion of measurements can be interpreted as a higher instability of the testing conditions. The variance for the 2Lh‾¹ dripper model was found to be homogeneous, while non-homogeneous for the other two models. The latter implies that at least one of the laboratories presented an uncertainty of measurement significantly different from the others. The measurement uncertainty undertaken in this study demonstrated that there were opportunities to improve the measurement process. Recommendations and suggestions for harmonisation of test procedures and improvements in individual laboratories are also identified in this paper.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 46(Part A), p. 1-11
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1873-6998
0955-5986
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 099901 Agricultural Engineering
090599 Civil Engineering not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 409901 Agricultural engineering
400599 Civil engineering not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960999 Land and Water Management of Environments not elsewhere classified
960913 Water Allocation and Quantification
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 190211 Water policy (incl. water allocation)
180305 Ground water quantification, allocation and impact of depletion
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on May 11, 2024

Page view(s)

1,072
checked on Jul 23, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Jul 23, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.