Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17634
Title: Is bigger better? An empirical analysis of waste management in New South Wales
Contributor(s): Carvalho, Pedro (author); Marques, Rui Cunha (author); Dollery, Brian E  (author)
Publication Date: 2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.024
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17634
Abstract: Across the world, rising demand for municipal solid waste services has seen an ongoing increase in the costs of providing these services. Moreover, municipal waste services have typically been provided through natural or legal monopolies, where few incentives exist to reduce costs. It is thus vital to examine empirically the cost structure of these services in order to develop effective public policies which can make these services more cost efficient. Accordingly, this paper considers economies of size and economies of output density in the municipal waste collection sector in the New South Wales (NSW) local government system in an effort to identify the optimal size of utilities from the perspective of cost efficiency. Our results show that - as presently constituted - NSW municipal waste services are not efficient in terms of costs, thereby demonstrating that 'bigger is not better.' The optimal size of waste utilities is estimated to fall in the range 12,000-20,000 inhabitants. However, significant economies of output density for unsorted (residual) municipal waste collection and recycling waste collection were found, which means it is advantageous to increase the amount of waste collected, but maintaining constant the number of customers and the intervention area.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Waste Management, v.39, p. 277-286
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1879-2456
0956-053X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 160509 Public Administration
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 440708 Public administration
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 940204 Public Services Policy Advice and Analysis
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 230204 Public services policy advice and analysis
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on Mar 9, 2024

Page view(s)

1,018
checked on Mar 9, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 9, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.