Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17361
Title: Authors' Reply to Li et al.: "Alternative Statistical Analysis Shows Exercise Training-Induced Improvements in Peak VO₂ are Clinically Significant"
Contributor(s): Parmenter, Belinda (author); Dieberg, Gudrun  (author)orcid ; Smart, Neil  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-015-0316-9
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17361
Abstract: We thank Dr. Li et al. for their commentary on our recently published meta-analysis in Sports Medicine. While there is no doubt that there is an argument for the use of a random-effects model in the presence of significant heterogeneity, such a model can introduce inherent problems of its own.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Sports Medicine, 45(5), p. 767-768
Publisher: Adis International Ltd
Place of Publication: New Zealand
ISSN: 1179-2035
0112-1642
Field of Research (FOR): 110201 Cardiology (incl Cardiovascular Diseases)
110602 Exercise Physiology
HERDC Category Description: C4 Letter of Note
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 324
Views: 315
Downloads: 1
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

164
checked on May 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.