Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparing Food Preference Assessment Methods in Brushtail Possums||Contributor(s):||Cronin, Ian Raymond (author); Foster, Therese Mary (author); Bizo, Lewis (author)||Publication Date:||2014||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/17228||Abstract:||A comparison was made between paired-stimulus and multiple-stimulus without-replacement preference assessments with the common brushtail possum ('Trichosurus vulpecula'). Both assessments identified similar preferences in foods by individual possums. A progressive-ratio reinforcer assessment showed that all foods identified in the preference assessments functioned as reinforcers when presented in a single-schedule arrangement, including those foods identified as low-preference. In a concurrent-schedule arrangement, the food type that was generally shown as being of high-preference at higher schedule requirements during the single-schedule assessment, was shown to have higher measures of preference again. It was also found that when the concurrent alternative was on a fixed-ratio 50 schedule, the impact upon preference was less than when the concurrent alternative was on a fixed-ratio 20. We concluded that preference is relative to the other alternatives available, and stimuli identified as low-preference when assessed through paired stimulus or multiple stimulus without replacement methods may still be appropriate to use as reinforcers to maintain operant responding.||Publication Type:||Conference Publication||Conference Name:||40th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI), Chicago, United States of America, 23rd - 27th May, 2014||Conference Details:||40th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI), Chicago, United States of America, 23rd - 27th May, 2014||Source of Publication:||Association for Behavior Analysis International 40th Annual Convention Program (# 434 Paper Session)||Publisher:||Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI)||Place of Publication:||online||Field of Research (FOR):||170110 Psychological Methodology, Design and Analysis||Socio-Economic Outcome Codes:||920410 Mental Health||HERDC Category Description:||E3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publication||Statistics to Oct 2018:||Visitors: 150
|Appears in Collections:||Conference Publication|
Files in This Item:
checked on Apr 5, 2019
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.