Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16866
Title: Opportunistically Acquired Evidence is Unsuitable Data to Model Fox ('Vulpes vulpes') Distribution in Tasmania
Contributor(s): Marks, Clive A (author); Obendorf, David (author); Pereira, Filipe (author); Edwards, Ivo (author); Hall, Graham  (author)
Publication Date: 2014
DOI: 10.1002/wsb.448
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/16866
Abstract: Despite the absence of direct observation of live foxes in the Tasmanian environment, a recent study concluded that foxes are now widespread on the island and proposed a habitat-specific model incorporating 9 cases of physical evidence presumed to confirm their unique presence. We briefly review the history of fox incursions into Tasmania and then assess the quality of putative physical evidence against a defined evidentiary standard. Overall, 14 of 17 incidents described since 1998 were associated with between 1 and 4 criteria indicative of unreliable data or were not associated with adequately documented physical evidence. Anonymous and anecdotal information was fully or partially relied upon in 10 of 17 cases and of these 5 were widely acknowledged to be hoaxes. We conclude that opportunistically acquired evidence is a poor substitute for data obtained by properly designed and independent wildlife surveys for confirming unique fox incursions and as the basis of ecological models predicting true habitat-specific fox distribution. Species rarity decreases the reliability of wildlife surveys and population models; thus validation of unique incursions in particular requires appropriate rigor in evidentiary standards and data quality. Precautionary management that may be considered in response to uncertain information, or opportunistically collected specimens of doubtful provenance, does not imply that such information should be treated as scientific data. We suggest that an eradication program is justified as a precautionary measure only after rigorous qualitative analysis reveals data capable of rejecting the null hypothesis that the species of interest is absent.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Wildlife Society Bulletin, 38(4), p. 757-766
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1938-5463
Field of Research (FOR): 060801 Animal Behaviour
050103 Invasive Species Ecology
060202 Community Ecology (excl Invasive Species Ecology)
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 342
Views: 367
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Nov 30, 2018

Page view(s)

188
checked on May 2, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.